On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org wrote:
tags 518735 - patch
thanks
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 09:10:36PM +0200, Julien Lavergne wrote:
tags 518735 patch
thanks
Attached patch (from upstream, r82784) should fix the problem.
Thanks for the patch!, ... but
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Michael Banck mba...@debian.org wrote:
The attached patch fixes this. However, ace still FTBFS due to some
autoconf2.64 in the AC_COMPILE_IFELSE() function in
AC_CHECK_FUNC(getpwnam_r) in ACE_wrappers/configure.ac:
checking for bsearch... yes
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:55:01PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Michael Banck mba...@debian.org wrote:
The attached patch fixes this. However, ace still FTBFS due to some
autoconf2.64 in the AC_COMPILE_IFELSE() function in
AC_CHECK_FUNC(getpwnam_r)
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Michael Banck mba...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:55:01PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Michael Banck mba...@debian.org wrote:
The attached patch fixes this. However, ace still FTBFS due to some
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:39:16PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Michael Banck mba...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:55:01PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
I don't see any discussion beyond what is in the bug report on
pkg-ace-devel in
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Michael Banck mba...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:39:16PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Michael Banck mba...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:55:01PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
I don't
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 03:31:34PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Michael Banck mba...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:39:16PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Michael Banck mba...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun,
Luk Claes wrote:
Hi
Any further progress in getting this FTBFS fixed?
I'm tempted to remove ace from testing if this bug does not get fixed
soon. The only reverse dependency which prevents the removal will soon
be diagnostics (maintainer Cc-ed).
Please don't. I am currently busy but I will
(Cross-posting from Debian)
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote:
Hi
Any further progress in getting this FTBFS fixed?
I'm tempted to remove ace from testing if this bug does not get fixed
soon. The only reverse dependency which prevents the removal will soon
be
9 matches
Mail list logo
