On 2009-08-18 Kumar Appaiah wrote:
[...]
> For the time being, instead of regenerating the configure file, I have
> just patched it in a very simple way, and have verified that it cures
> the FTBFS.
> Thanks, and sorry for making you rebuild the package due to an error
> on my part. :-)
No worri
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 529840 + patch
Bug #529840 [neon26] neon26: FTBFS against gnutls26 >= 2.7.x
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
tags 529840 + patch
thanks
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:05:18PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > Hej,
> > it still fails for me. Buildlog attached.
>
> My bad. Sorry for missing this.
>
> I'll try to figure out a way to avoid this tonight.
Dear Andreas,
For the time being, instead of regenerating
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 07:19:03PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2009-08-18 Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > The package (neon36) actually seems to build, since SSL presence
> > doesn't check for gnutls, if I am right. Could you please build the
> > package and confirm this for me if you ca?
>
> Hej
On 2009-08-18 Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> The package (neon36) actually seems to build, since SSL presence
> doesn't check for gnutls, if I am right. Could you please build the
> package and confirm this for me if you ca?
Hej,
it still fails for me. Buildlog attached.
cu andreas
--
`What a good fri
Hi!
The package (neon36) actually seems to build, since SSL presence
doesn't check for gnutls, if I am right. Could you please build the
package and confirm this for me if you ca?
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
6 matches
Mail list logo
