Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Luk Claes wrote:
>> Unfortunately a binNMU will not fix this as the transitional packages in
>> giflib are gone, so you have to change the build dependency on
>> libungif4-dev to libgif-dev.
>
> while it's good to finally update the packages build-depending on
> giflib, the
Luk Claes wrote:
> Unfortunately a binNMU will not fix this as the transitional packages in
> giflib are gone, so you have to change the build dependency on
> libungif4-dev to libgif-dev.
while it's good to finally update the packages build-depending on
giflib, the latter still provides the old na
peter green wrote:
>> Package: metapixel
>> Version: 1.9.2-5
> This looks like a typo, can you confirm/deny that you mean 1.0.2-5?
>
>> metapixel cannot be installed because it depends on libugif4g which is
>> no more
>> available.
>> From a quick test it looks like a binnmu will fix this. CCing
>
notfound 540147 1.9.2-5
found 540147 1.0.2-5
thanks
Yes, sorry. 9 is just near 0 on the keyboard :/
Fixing version tracking information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Peter,
Le 07/08/2009 05:17:09, peter green a écrit :
>
>>Package: metapixel
>>Version: 1.9.2-5
>This looks like a typo, can you confirm/deny that you mean 1.0.2-5?
Yes, sorry. 9 is just near 0 on the keyboard :/
[jean-...@tangerine] % apt-cache policy metapixel
metapixel:
Installé : (aucun
Package: metapixel
Version: 1.9.2-5
This looks like a typo, can you confirm/deny that you mean 1.0.2-5?
metapixel cannot be installed because it depends on libugif4g which is no more
available.
From a quick test it looks like a binnmu will fix this. CCing debian-release to
get one scheduled.
6 matches
Mail list logo
