I'm attaching more info, needless to say I did an upgrade and everything
(bind-related) broke again (for the 5th time or so), I'll probably just run
something else on the machine 'cause being without DNS is obviously not fun
and a huge waste of time :( Most daemons are not prepared to deal with
Stéphane,
What keeps you from reopening the bug with more information? You know
me too messages are quite useless and on my main server doesn't
really bring any useful info for hunting down this bug. Same as your
rant below.
What about adding at least what reportbug adds to its bugreports:
-
Hi Ondřej,
2009/8/23 Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org
John,
could you please add libdns50 version and dependencies to the bug
report, please? Again you can just add reportbug
The original bug report _is_ from reportbug. Here's the libdns50 line:
ii libdns50 1:9.6.1.dfsg.P1-1
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 01:33, John D. Rowellj...@eyb.com.br wrote:
Hi Ondřej,
2009/8/23 Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org
John,
could you please add libdns50 version and dependencies to the bug
report, please? Again you can just add reportbug
The original bug report _is_ from reportbug.
Why is this bug still marked as fixed ?
It isn't ! (See Message #32 et #37)
Thanks,
Stephane Dupont.
5 matches
Mail list logo
