Thanks everyone for your assistance.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:31:44PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
>>
>> Still broken, not noticably different.
>
> There we go again:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/dacfix4/
>
> Luca: Last July you helped me debug a problem related to
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 02:31:33PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 06:40:55AM +0100, Paul Martin wrote:
> > It works here, too. I did notice that the scrolling is very slow for a GHz
> > CPU, slower than a 1980s micro at similar resolution.
>
> Is that a regression?
Not rea
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 06:40:55AM +0100, Paul Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 02:22:32AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:48:01PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> > > Robert Millan wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:31:44PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 02:22:32AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:48:01PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> > Robert Millan wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:31:44PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Still broken, not noticably different.
> > >
> > > T
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:48:01PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:31:44PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> > >
> > > Still broken, not noticably different.
> >
> > There we go again:
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/dacfix4/
>
> Im
Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:31:44PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> >
> > Still broken, not noticably different.
>
> There we go again:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/dacfix4/
Improvement.
It successfully enters gfxterm, console commands including vbeinfo work
in
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:31:44PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
>
> Still broken, not noticably different.
There we go again:
http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/dacfix4/
Luca: Last July you helped me debug a problem related to vga= parameter
(bug #535026). There's a new bug (which probably do
Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 03:13:29PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 01:36:41AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > >
> > > Here's a fixed build. Please confirm it's working and we'll get
> > > this fix merged ASAP.
> > >
> > > http://people.debian.org
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 03:13:29PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 01:36:41AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> >
> > Here's a fixed build. Please confirm it's working and we'll get this fix
> > merged ASAP.
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/dacfix/
>
> Second attemp
Robert Millan wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 01:36:41AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> >
> > Here's a fixed build. Please confirm it's working and we'll get
> > this fix merged ASAP.
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/dacfix/
>
> Second attempt:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~rmh/a
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 01:36:41AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Here's a fixed build. Please confirm it's working and we'll get this fix
> merged ASAP.
>
> http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/dacfix/
Second attempt:
http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/dacfix2/
--
Robert Millan
The DRM
Robert Millan wrote:
> Here's a fixed build. Please confirm it's working and we'll get this
> fix merged ASAP.
>
> http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/dacfix/
Sorry, but no. This falls back to text mode, with unaligned pointers.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debia
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:44:12PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> > http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/nodac/
>
> It seems to work okay. Thanks for your efforts.
Thanks to you all. Colin Watson has found two severe bugs in my assembly
implementation of grub_vbe_bios_getset_dac_palette(). I bel
Robert Millan wrote:
> Ok, can you try this one as well? Just to be sure 1.97~beta2-2 works
> fine for you once DAC calls are removed.
>
> http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/nodac/
It seems to work okay. Thanks for your efforts.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debi
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:25:33PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>
> > > 2476 is badly broken. The package has trouble even installing, and
> > > after manually interfering, the actual grub fails, too. Can't go
> > > into graphical mode, can't boot, unaligned pointer.
> >
>
Robert Millan wrote:
> > 2476 is badly broken. The package has trouble even installing, and
> > after manually interfering, the actual grub fails, too. Can't go
> > into graphical mode, can't boot, unaligned pointer.
>
> Great, just as I expected. Please try this one now:
>
> http://people.de
Btw, make sure you're not passing "vga=" parameter to Linux, it would
disrupt the test.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 07:04:33PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 01:58:13AM +0200, Witold Baryluk wrote:
> > > Dnia 2009-09-08, wto o godzinie 22:55 +0200, Robert Millan pisze:
> > > > Please test:
> > > >
> > > > http://people.debian.org/~rmh
Robert Millan wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 01:58:13AM +0200, Witold Baryluk wrote:
> > Dnia 2009-09-08, wto o godzinie 22:55 +0200, Robert Millan pisze:
> > > Please test:
> > >
> > > http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2464/
> > >
> > It works correctly here.
>
> Thanks. Then please test:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 01:58:13AM +0200, Witold Baryluk wrote:
> Dnia 2009-09-08, wto o godzinie 22:55 +0200, Robert Millan pisze:
> > Please test:
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2464/
> >
> It works correctly here.
Thanks. Then please test:
http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/24
Dnia 2009-09-08, wto o godzinie 22:55 +0200, Robert Millan pisze:
> Please test:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2464/
>
It works correctly here.
--
Witold Baryluk
signature.asc
Description: To jest część wiadomości podpisana cyfrowo
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 04:28:29PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> > http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2440/
>
> 20090721 works, 20090808 fails. I switched between the two a couple of
> times to make sure. Seems it's pretty well narrowed down now. :-)
Ok.
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 05:35:42PM +0200
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 04:42:17PM +0200, Witold Baryluk wrote:
> > http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2440/
>
> This one 1.96+20090721-5 is more complicated.
>
> It is kind of regression, because it doesn't enter graphical mode.
>
> [...]
> I can't use loadfont because there is no .pf2 files i
Dnia 2009-09-08, wto o godzinie 15:49 +0200, Robert Millan pisze:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 03:17:33PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> > > http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2392/
> >
> > Still works.
>
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 03:29:12PM +0200, Witold Baryluk wrote:
> >
> > I just tested 1.96+2
Robert Millan wrote:
> Ok. Please test:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2440/
20090721 works, 20090808 fails. I switched between the two a couple of
times to make sure. Seems it's pretty well narrowed down now. :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
Dnia 2009-09-08, wto o godzinie 15:49 +0200, Robert Millan pisze:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 03:17:33PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> > > http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2392/
> >
> > Still works.
>
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 03:29:12PM +0200, Witold Baryluk wrote:
> >
> > I just tested 1.96+2
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 03:17:33PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> > http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2392/
>
> Still works.
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 03:29:12PM +0200, Witold Baryluk wrote:
>
> I just tested 1.96+20090702-1 on T43. It works:
Ok. Please test:
http://people.debian.org/~rmh/at
Hi
I just tested 1.96+20090702-1 on T43. It works: enters graphical mode
correctly, with background, fonts, etc, booting works correctly
for linux also.
--
Witold Baryluk
signature.asc
Description: To jest część wiadomości podpisana cyfrowo
Robert Millan wrote:
> Ok. Please try:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2392/
Still works.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 12:43:55AM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 09:18:19PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> > > Robert Millan wrote:
> > > > > > Here's the first one:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2106/
> > >
> > >
Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 09:18:19PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> > Robert Millan wrote:
> > > > > Here's the first one:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2106/
> >
> > Still works.
>
> Second one:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2297/
Stil
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 09:18:19PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > > > Here's the first one:
> > > >
> > > > http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2106/
>
> Still works.
Second one:
http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2297/
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Yo
Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 05:34:25PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> > Robert Millan wrote:
> >
> > > Still down. I guess I'll be your snapshots.debian.net today.
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > > Here's the first one:
> > >
> > > http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2106/
> >
> > I'm
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 05:34:25PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>
> > Still down. I guess I'll be your snapshots.debian.net today.
>
> :-)
>
> > Here's the first one:
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2106/
>
> I'm sorry, my T43p is fairly old (2005 model). It
Robert Millan wrote:
> Still down. I guess I'll be your snapshots.debian.net today.
:-)
> Here's the first one:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~rmh/ati/2106/
I'm sorry, my T43p is fairly old (2005 model). Its Pentium M processor
is strictly i686, not amd64 compatible.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 10:15:13PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>
> > > > Would you please test the version in squeeze (1.96+20090808-1)?
> > >
> > > Fails.
>
> > And the one in lenny (1.96+20080724-16)?
>
> Works. I purged before installing this one, because I wouldn't w
Am Sonntag, den 06.09.2009, 22:15 +0200 schrieb Maik Zumstrull:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>
> > > > Would you please test the version in squeeze (1.96+20090808-1)?
> > >
> > > Fails.
>
> > And the one in lenny (1.96+20080724-16)?
>
> Works. I purged before installing this one, because I wouldn't w
Robert Millan wrote:
> > > Would you please test the version in squeeze (1.96+20090808-1)?
> >
> > Fails.
> And the one in lenny (1.96+20080724-16)?
Works. I purged before installing this one, because I wouldn't want to
bet that a downgrade that far works cleanly.
It successfully enters graphi
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 07:20:44PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>
> > > Again, it doesn't go into graphical mode by itself, and boots okay
> > > in console mode. Here are the results for different commands on the
> > > console:
> > >
> > > terminal_output.gfxterm:
> > > Cle
Robert Millan wrote:
> > Again, it doesn't go into graphical mode by itself, and boots okay
> > in console mode. Here are the results for different commands on the
> > console:
> >
> > terminal_output.gfxterm:
> > Clears the screen and prints "error: No suitable mode found."
> >
> > vbetest:
> >
[ Please don't drop the BTS from CC. ]
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 12:59:42AM +0100, Paul Martin wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 12:21:01AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> > Do you know how to run a regression test? You can do that e.g. with
> > svn-bisect, but it's a bit tricky since you'll need
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 12:55:25PM +0200, Maik Zumstrull wrote:
> ~/Desktop % sudo dpkg -i *.deb
> [...]
> sp8...@maik-2130 ~/Desktop % sudo grub-install /dev/sda
> [...]
> sp8...@maik-2130 ~/Desktop % sudo update-grub
Ok, this test process seems adequate.
> Again, it doesn't go into graphical mo
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 10:27:09PM +0100, Paul Martin wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 09:51:17PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 06:51:00PM +0100, Paul Martin wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 09:36:23PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 06:36:3
Hi,
I uploaded this GRUB snapshot, it's from right after a video framework
restructure commit that I suspect might be the culprit:
http://people.debian.org/~rmh/grub-after-fb-split/
Please report if it works.
Please make sure GRUB is running on gfxterm when you test it!! Tests reporting
tha
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 11:05:09PM +0200, Witold Baryluk wrote:
> Dnia 2009-09-02, śro o godzinie 20:01 +0200, Robert Millan pisze:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I uploaded this GRUB snapshot, it's from right after a video framework
> > restructure commit that I suspect might be the culprit:
> >
> > http://p
Dnia 2009-09-02, śro o godzinie 20:01 +0200, Robert Millan pisze
> >Please report if it works. Thanks!
>
> Works for me.
>...
> I will try 1.96+20090317-1 now, because this is probably the version
> which had gfxterm working correctly.
Ok, i can't test 1.96+20090317-1 because snapshot.debian.net
47 matches
Mail list logo
