* Alan Woodland awoodl...@debian.org, 2009-09-17, 19:44:
2) Patch l7-filter-userspace to look into /usr/share/l7-protocols for
protocol definitions rather than /etc/l7-protocols. Then l7-protocols could
provide no /etc/l7-protocols at all.
This might be a sensible option, although it's a
2009/9/18 Jakub Wilk uba...@users.sf.net:
* Alan Woodland awoodl...@debian.org, 2009-09-17, 19:44:
2) Patch l7-filter-userspace to look into /usr/share/l7-protocols for
protocol definitions rather than /etc/l7-protocols. Then l7-protocols
could
provide no /etc/l7-protocols at all.
This
* Alan Woodland awoodl...@debian.org, 2009-09-17 19:44:
1) /etc/l7-protocols would be a symlink to /usr/share/l7-protocols managed
by maintainer scripts of l7-protocols. It is not clear what to do during
removal (and before purge) - we shouldn't leave a dangling symlink in /etc.
I would avoid
2009/9/17 Piotr Lewandowski piotr.lewandow...@gmail.com:
Hi Alan,
I need your advice what to do with my first RC-bug. :)
I would normally recommend CC'ing discussions relating to how to fix
the bug to the bug report itself - someone else might read the bug and
have something relevant to offer
Package: l7-protocols
Version: 20090528-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.8.3
l7-protocols would happily overwrite user configuration files:
# ls -l /etc/l7-protocols/extra/http-itunes.pat
-rw--- 1 root root 30 Sep 14 22:57 /etc/l7-protocols/extra/http-itunes.pat
# dpkg -i
5 matches
Mail list logo
