* Daniel Burrows (dburr...@debian.org) [100109 16:58]:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 01:36:19PM +0100, Petr Salinger
petr.salin...@seznam.cz was heard to say:
IMHO, yet better would be patch below, some library might use some
other signal internally, you really want to only block SIGWINCH.
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 01:36:19PM +0100, Petr Salinger
petr.salin...@seznam.cz was heard to say:
IMHO, yet better would be patch below, some library might use some
other signal internally, you really want to only block SIGWINCH.
Sounds good to me.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
It might be due to The use of the sigprocmask() function is
unspecified in a multi-threaded process.
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/pthread_sigmask.html
I do not have kfreebsd box handy now.
Kibi, please, does it work with pthread_sigmask() instead of sigprocmask() ?
| +sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, mask, NULL);
(I'm Cc-ing debian-bsd@, in case somebody has an idea about what's going
on exactly.)
It might be due to The use of the sigprocmask() function is unspecified
in a multi-threaded process.
Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz (08/12/2009):
It might be due to The use of the sigprocmask() function is
unspecified in a multi-threaded process.
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/pthread_sigmask.html
I do not have kfreebsd box handy now.
Kibi, please, does it
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.1.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Broken package manager, broken d-i, etc.
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
for quite a while, we've had broken GNU/kFreeBSD d-i images, users
complaining about installation being stuck at 1%.
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.1.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Broken package manager, broken d-i, etc.
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Gee, what a great bug report, Kibi...:-)
Great analysis, huge work
7 matches
Mail list logo
