On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 09:27:44AM +0800, Chen-Tse Tsai wrote:
Sorry for the inconvenience.
This is because we think libsvm is only a simple library(one header and one
library),
also we want to keep it as simple as possible and as close to upstream as
possible.
If it causes too many
I am planning on abandoning libsvm-ruby like I orphaned the libsvm
package. In my opinion there is little chance for the upstream
packaging to be improved in LIBSVM as I have been trying to convince
upstream to do certain improvements for years and they resisted. Now
I am reducing my investment
Hi!
libsvm-ruby relies on a libsvm.pc file to figure out how to build with
libsvm. This convenience has gone away between the 2.89-1 and 2.90-1
uploads of your package, causing libsvm-ruby to FTBFS on a QA rebuild.
The libsvm changelog simply states,
| * Removed libsvm.pc from libsvm-dev.
May
3 matches
Mail list logo
