Bug#568291: possible buffer overflows

2010-07-27 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 10:04:22PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 04/06/10 19:37, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Do GNOME maintainers plan to include gmime2.2 in Squeeze or will it dropped in favour of gmime2.4? I've dropped the Mono bindings in our svn. The C library still has four

Bug#568291: possible buffer overflows

2010-06-04 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 12:52:06PM +0100, Steffen Joeris wrote: Hi Mirco Hi GMime upstream has released latest 2.4.15 [1] version of the library fixing one security issue. From 2.4.15-changes [2] file: 2010-01-31 Jeffrey Stedfast f...@novell.com *

Bug#568291: possible buffer overflows

2010-06-04 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 04/06/10 19:37, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Do GNOME maintainers plan to include gmime2.2 in Squeeze or will it dropped in favour of gmime2.4? I've dropped the Mono bindings in our svn. The C library still has four reverse dependencies. All of them have bug reports for months, but nobody has

Bug#568291: possible buffer overflows

2010-02-04 Thread Steffen Joeris
Hi Mirco Hi GMime upstream has released latest 2.4.15 [1] version of the library fixing one security issue. From 2.4.15-changes [2] file: 2010-01-31 Jeffrey Stedfast f...@novell.com * gmime/gmime-encodings.h (GMIME_UUENCODE_LEN): Fixed to prevent possible buffer

Bug#568291: possible buffer overflows

2010-02-03 Thread Steffen Joeris
Package: libgmime-2.0-2a Severity: grave Tags: security patch Hi GMime upstream has released latest 2.4.15 [1] version of the library fixing one security issue. From 2.4.15-changes [2] file: 2010-01-31 Jeffrey Stedfast f...@novell.com * gmime/gmime-encodings.h (GMIME_UUENCODE_LEN):

Bug#568291: possible buffer overflows

2010-02-03 Thread Mirco Bauer
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:12:45 +0100 Steffen Joeris steffen.joe...@skolelinux.de wrote: Package: libgmime-2.0-2a Severity: grave Tags: security patch Hi GMime upstream has released latest 2.4.15 [1] version of the library fixing one security issue. From 2.4.15-changes [2] file: