On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 10:04:22PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 04/06/10 19:37, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Do GNOME maintainers plan to include gmime2.2 in Squeeze or will it
dropped in favour of gmime2.4?
I've dropped the Mono bindings in our svn. The C library still has four
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 12:52:06PM +0100, Steffen Joeris wrote:
Hi Mirco
Hi
GMime upstream has released latest 2.4.15 [1] version of the
library fixing one security issue. From 2.4.15-changes [2] file:
2010-01-31 Jeffrey Stedfast f...@novell.com
*
On 04/06/10 19:37, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Do GNOME maintainers plan to include gmime2.2 in Squeeze or will it
dropped in favour of gmime2.4?
I've dropped the Mono bindings in our svn. The C library still has four reverse
dependencies. All of them have bug reports for months, but nobody has
Hi Mirco
Hi
GMime upstream has released latest 2.4.15 [1] version of the
library fixing one security issue. From 2.4.15-changes [2] file:
2010-01-31 Jeffrey Stedfast f...@novell.com
* gmime/gmime-encodings.h (GMIME_UUENCODE_LEN): Fixed to
prevent possible buffer
Package: libgmime-2.0-2a
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Hi
GMime upstream has released latest 2.4.15 [1] version of the
library fixing one security issue. From 2.4.15-changes [2] file:
2010-01-31 Jeffrey Stedfast f...@novell.com
* gmime/gmime-encodings.h (GMIME_UUENCODE_LEN):
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:12:45 +0100
Steffen Joeris steffen.joe...@skolelinux.de wrote:
Package: libgmime-2.0-2a
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Hi
GMime upstream has released latest 2.4.15 [1] version of the
library fixing one security issue. From 2.4.15-changes [2] file:
6 matches
Mail list logo