On 08/19/2010 04:29 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Sorry, this is not acceptable. The patch
> - differes in comments,
> - used path,
> - removes autoconf parts without reason, autoreconf is called anyway, and
> - is incomplete.
Well, FWIW this is instead acceptable from a NMUer point of view, anyway
t
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:29:18PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> On 08/19/2010 12:54 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Please describe the changes you made. It even differs in the comments.
> > This only shows the annoncement, the patch is in
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=434982
On 08/19/2010 01:29 PM, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> It is the same patch without the configure and Makefile stuff (upstream
> added --with-default-run-dir configure argument, I instead hardcoded it
> to /var/run/clvmd.sock ). I removed that part to avoid autoreconf
I just noted I forgot check_permi
On 08/19/2010 12:54 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Please describe the changes you made. It even differs in the comments.
> This only shows the annoncement, the patch is in
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=434982
It is the same patch without the configure and Makefile stuff (upstream
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:39:28PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> On 08/19/2010 12:26 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Where does this patch come from? It is not included into the upstream
> > source this way. As long as this is not known: NACK.
> It comes from upstream, I used the essential part of
On 08/19/2010 12:26 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Where does this patch come from? It is not included into the upstream
> source this way. As long as this is not known: NACK.
It comes from upstream, I used the essential part of the patch.
Please see:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-lvm/2010-Ju
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:06:34PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU for lvm2 (versioned as 2.02.66-2.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/1. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
Where does this patch come from? It is not included into the upstream
source this
tags 591204 + patch
tags 591204 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for lvm2 (versioned as 2.02.66-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/1. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
Giuseppe
diff -Nru lvm2-2.02.66/debian/changelog lvm2-2.02.66/debian/changelo
8 matches
Mail list logo