merge 597530 397757
thanks
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 23:49 +0200, "Stefan Monnier"
wrote:
> > See #397757 why this would be correct.
> Agreed. I guess this can be merged with #397757.
Hence.
/* era */
--
If this were a real .signature, it would suck less. Well, maybe not.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
>> I have lost a few days's worth of outgoing email because Emacs
>> decided that it did not need to pass "-f" to sendmail any more
> For the record, Debian's emacs2[123] packages always behaved this way,
> so "any more" just refers to you suddenly using them instead of vanilla
> Emacs.
Yes, I rea
On 2010-09-20 15:24 +0200, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Package: emacs23
> Version: 23.2+1-4
> Severity: critical
> Tags: patch
> Justification: causes serious data loss
>
> I have lost a few days's worth of outgoing email because Emacs decided that it
> did not need to pass "-f" to sendmail any more
Package: emacs23
Version: 23.2+1-4
Severity: critical
Tags: patch
Justification: causes serious data loss
I have lost a few days's worth of outgoing email because Emacs decided that it
did not need to pass "-f" to sendmail any more (resulting in the envelope-from
address in this outgoing mail to h
4 matches
Mail list logo
