Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#On 2010-10-05 Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org wrote:
#[...]
# It is no new breakage, 2.9.14's testsuite gets stuck at exactly the
# same point, the debian package just did not run it then.
reassign 599092 libpano13-bin 2.9.14-2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forwarded 599092
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3082342group_id=96188atid=613954
Bug #599092 [libpano13-bin] endless loop on PowerPC
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
On 2010-10-04 Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org wrote:
[...]
What hangs is
$builddirroot/libpano13-2.9.17+dfsg/tools/.libs/lt-PTmender -o output temp.txt
in $builddirroot/libpano13-2.9.17+dfsg/tests/simpleStitch
[...]
It is no new breakage, 2.9.14's testsuite gets stuck at exactly
On 2010-10-04 Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org wrote:
On 2010-10-04 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 06:31:54PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Is it possible the failing buildd has too little RAM and ends up
swapping itself to death?
Possibly but
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 08:23:58PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Changing opt from char to int (Thank you www.opengroup.org example
code) fixes the issue.
Good catch indeed. The signedness of char is arch-ABI-dependent and int is
what the API of getopt(3) tells the developer, anyway.
Kind
Source: libpano13
Version: 2.9.17+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
150 mins should be enough to generate panoramas on Xserve G5, no? If it really
should take that long, please add output while it's generating it.
sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.60.0 (23 Feb 2010) on poulenc.debian.org
On 2010-10-04 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
Source: libpano13
Version: 2.9.17+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
150 mins should be enough to generate panoramas on Xserve G5, no?
If it really should take that long, please add output while it's
generating it.
[...]
To perform all tests:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 06:31:54PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Is it possible the failing buildd has too little RAM and ends up
swapping itself to death?
Possibly but unlikely:
pk...@poulenc:~$ free -m
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem:
On 2010-10-04 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 06:31:54PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Is it possible the failing buildd has too little RAM and ends up
swapping itself to death?
Possibly but unlikely:
pk...@poulenc:~$ free -m
total used
9 matches
Mail list logo