Bug#633600: nova: inadequate copyright file

2011-12-15 Thread Marcos Marado
FYI, https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/810051 is marked as fix-released since 2011-09-16. I have the impression that they only fixed part of the problem, but I will let you analise that and tell so upstream if that's the case. -- Marcos Marado -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#633600: [Openstack] Fwd: Bug#633600: nova: inadequate copyright file

2011-07-13 Thread Jay Pipes
-vmlinuz should be in the original sources at all. These are sourceless files, and cannot fit Debian at all. Thomas Original Message Subject: Bug#633600: nova: inadequate copyright file Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:54:02 + Resent-From: Mike O'Connor s...@vireo.org

Bug#633600: nova: inadequate copyright file

2011-07-11 Thread Mike O'Connor
Source: nova Version: 2011.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 In reviewing this source package, I find several problems with the copyright file: tools/ajaxterm/sarissa* are LGPL, but this is not mentioned in debian/copyright. The rest of ajaxterm is public domain In the

Bug#633600: nova: inadequate copyright file

2011-07-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 07/12/2011 07:50 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote: Source: nova Version: 2011.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 In reviewing this source package, I find several problems with the copyright file: tools/ajaxterm/sarissa* are LGPL, but this is not mentioned in debian/copyright.

Bug#633600: Fwd: Bug#633600: nova: inadequate copyright file

2011-07-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
#633600: nova: inadequate copyright file Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:54:02 + Resent-From: Mike O'Connor s...@vireo.org Resent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:50:39 -0400 From: Mike O'Connor s...@vireo.org Reply-To: Mike