Bug#650599: snooper FTBFS: -ltermcap doesn't work

tags 650599 +patch thanks It's a bug in the snooper configure script. Applying the following patch: --8---cut here---start-8--- --- a/build/configure.in1998-02-23 15:18:30.0 +0100 +++ b/build/configure.in2011-12-01

Processed: Re: Bug#650599: snooper FTBFS: -ltermcap doesn't work

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 650599 +patch Bug #650599 [snooper] snooper FTBFS: -ltermcap doesn't work Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 650599: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650599

Bug#650599: snooper FTBFS: -ltermcap doesn't work

tags 650599 + wheezy thanks On 2011-12-01 00:52 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: Package: snooper Version: 19991202-7 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi, snooper FTBFS in a current sid system. Build logs for armhf [1] and s390x [2] show this easily, but it's not limited to these new

Processed: Re: Bug#650599: snooper FTBFS: -ltermcap doesn't work

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 650599 + wheezy Bug #650599 [snooper] snooper FTBFS: -ltermcap doesn't work Added tag(s) wheezy. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 650599: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650599

Bug#650599: snooper FTBFS: -ltermcap doesn't work

Package: snooper Version: 19991202-7 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi, snooper FTBFS in a current sid system. Build logs for armhf [1] and s390x [2] show this easily, but it's not limited to these new architectures. Building on amd64 shows the same problem, failure to link due to missing

Bug#650599: snooper FTBFS: -ltermcap doesn't work

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:52:59PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: Package: snooper Version: 19991202-7 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi, snooper FTBFS in a current sid system. Build logs for armhf [1] and s390x [2] show this easily, but it's not limited to these new architectures. Building on amd64