Hi Francesco,
Do you recommend that we build the next NetCDF from 4.1.1 or should we
use the 4.1.3 from experimental as the base?
Regards
Alastair
On 2012-02-07 13:17, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:28:00AM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
On 2012-02-02 01:43, Steve
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 02:32:07PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
Hi Francesco,
Do you recommend that we build the next NetCDF from 4.1.1 or should we
use the 4.1.3 from experimental as the base?
Regards
Alastair
AFAIK Sylvestre is going to reset the dependencies chain in hdf5 to
On 2012-02-02 01:43, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to contribute towards a solution for this. I'm forwarding to
debian-devel to get some others' ideas.
Naively, I don't understand why netcdf can't offer multiple variants,
just as hdf5 does. Or, at least, one package
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:28:00AM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
On 2012-02-02 01:43, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to contribute towards a solution for this. I'm forwarding to
debian-devel to get some others' ideas.
Naively, I don't understand why netcdf can't offer multiple
4 matches
Mail list logo
