(cc'ing debian-dpkg@ as this possibly is a problem for any dpkg user)
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org wrote:
So it would seem to me the arch-qualifying logic in apt is not right,
it really only ever needs to arch-qualify if:
* dpkg supports
Control: clone -1 aptitude
[ CCing aptitude due to the clone, please see the bug report for more
details, also about it probably deserving to be serious. ]
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 13:53:47 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 05:26:00PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
So it would seem to me the arch-qualifying logic in apt is not right,
it really only ever needs to arch-qualify if:
* dpkg supports --assert-multi-arch
AND
* the package is Multi-Arch:same
Because M-A:same packages are
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 13:53:47 +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org wrote:
So it would seem to me the arch-qualifying logic in apt is not right,
it really
On 2012-09-03 21:05:06 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
Control: clone -1 aptitude
[ CCing aptitude due to the clone, please see the bug report for more
details, also about it probably deserving to be serious. ]
The clone still isn't in the BTS while there are more recent bugs
than 2012-09-03
Control: clone 686346 -2
Control: reassign -2 aptitude
Control: retitle -1 apt: Should not arch-qualify arch-less packages on dpkg
calls
Control: retitle -2 aptitude: Should not arch-qualfy arch-less packages on dpkg
calls
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 01:41:36 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On
Processing control commands:
clone 686346 -2
Bug #686346 [apt] dpkg is wrong about the install state of docbook-mathml,
making the system in inconsistent state
Bug 686346 cloned as bug 686626
reassign -2 aptitude
Bug #686626 [apt] dpkg is wrong about the install state of docbook-mathml,
On 3 September 2012 19:53, David Kalnischkies
kalnischkies+deb...@gmail.com wrote:
Otherwise we need to clone this to aptitude (as it does some direct dpkg
calling on its own as far as I know) and whatever other dpkg front-end assumed
that it could arch-qualify everything in a multi-arch
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.8
Severity: serious
I did the following:
ay:~ sudo apt-get install --purge debian-archive-keyring debian-faq
debian-goodies debianutils deborphan desktop-file-utils dialog dict dict-foldoc
dict-wn dictd dictionaries-common dictzip doc-base docbook-defguide-
Hi!
On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 14:17:46 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.16.8
Severity: serious
apt-get started to remove packages, but for docbook-mathml, dpkg
said that it wasn't installed:
[...]
dpkg: warning: ignoring request to remove docbook-mathml which isn't
Processing control commands:
reassign -1 apt
Bug #686346 [dpkg] dpkg is wrong about the install state of docbook-mathml,
making the system in inconsistent state
Bug reassigned from package 'dpkg' to 'apt'.
No longer marked as found in versions dpkg/1.16.8.
Ignoring request to alter fixed
Control: reassign -1 apt
Hi!
[ APT maintainers, the quick summary is that on an apt removal run,
dpkg fails notifying an installed package is not installed, please
see the bug report for more details and attached files, etc. ]
On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 16:43:19 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On
12 matches
Mail list logo