Bug#690319: lookup fail to contact nslcd when first 1024 filedescriptor are already used (select)

2013-05-02 Thread Arthur de Jong
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 23:05 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: I noticed (by chance) there is a problem with the squeeze-security patch for #690319; it introduces a regression on kfreebsd and has not built. I'm not sure where to find build logs of this, or if they are public, but I think it is

Bug#690319: lookup fail to contact nslcd when first 1024 filedescriptor are already used (select)

2013-05-01 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi, I noticed (by chance) there is a problem with the squeeze-security patch for #690319; it introduces a regression on kfreebsd and has not built. I'm not sure where to find build logs of this, or if they are public, but I think it is due to using a non-standard EBADFD errno (file descriptor

Processed: Re: Bug#690319: lookup fail to contact nslcd when first 1024 filedescriptor are already used (select)

2013-02-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tags -1 + security Bug #690319 {Done: Arthur de Jong adej...@debian.org} [nss-pam-ldapd] lookup fail to contact nslcd when first 1024 filedescriptor are already used (select) Added tag(s) security. -- 690319: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690319

Bug#690319: lookup fail to contact nslcd when first 1024 filedescriptor are already used (select)

2013-02-18 Thread Arthur de Jong
Control: tags -1 + security It has been determined that this bug has security implications and CVE-2013-0288 has been assigned to this issue. For more details see the upstream advisory: http://arthurdejong.org/nss-pam-ldapd/CVE-2013-0288 A Debian security advisory for this issue will be issued

Bug#690319: lookup fail to contact nslcd when first 1024 filedescriptor are already used (select)

2012-10-12 Thread Arthur de Jong
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 16:04 +0200, Adrien Urban wrote: When trying to get the identity, after establishing the connection (connect /var/run/nslcd/socket), it uses select to wait on it. If the filedescriptor is over 1024, it still uses FD_SET to write outside of the fd_set, and calls select