Bug#693263: qcontrol: wheezy version of qcontrol does not support --direct

2013-01-09 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 07:48 +0100, Hanno Hecker wrote: * why does this only happen while I use the wheezy2 package? I've rebuilt the initramfs now ~10 times with this, with the wheezy1 and the sid version this never happened (and those were always generated, I've used the deb

Bug#693263: qcontrol: wheezy version of qcontrol does not support --direct

2013-01-06 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 07:48 +0100, Hanno Hecker wrote: ... full boot log is attached, there you can see it stops while / after installing knfsd. My kernel log stops then as well. I think it is just because all further output is from the proper userspace and isn't going to the kernel logs.

Bug#693263: qcontrol: wheezy version of qcontrol does not support --direct

2013-01-06 Thread Hanno Hecker
On Sun, 06 Jan 2013 09:37:25 + Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote: On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 07:48 +0100, Hanno Hecker wrote: * why does this only happen while I use the wheezy2 package? I've rebuilt the initramfs now ~10 times with this, with the wheezy1 and the sid version this

Bug#693263: qcontrol: wheezy version of qcontrol does not support --direct

2013-01-06 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 16:23 +0100, Hanno Hecker wrote: * should udev start before qcontrol and should evdev.ko be in the modules list? or does qcontrol switch the watchdog off w/o it? it seems like it works without it... evdev.ko is only needed to handle button presses, the

Bug#693263: qcontrol: wheezy version of qcontrol does not support --direct

2013-01-05 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 10:17 +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: The device booted fine but I saw the following error: | Error opening /dev/input/by-path/platform-gpio-keys-event: No such file or directory which makes me wonder whether qcontrol was really executed properly. I finally found an old

Bug#693263: qcontrol: wheezy version of qcontrol does not support --direct

2013-01-05 Thread Hanno Hecker
On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 20:04:14 + Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote: Hanno, I'm afraid don't know what is causing your boot failures but I don't think it is related to the new qcontrol package :-( No, it's not related to qcontrol: A few things I tried while diagnosing this today:

Bug#693263: qcontrol: wheezy version of qcontrol does not support --direct

2013-01-03 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Hanno Hecker hah+deb...@uu-x.de [2013-01-01 10:37]: Martin: This is a new TS-419P II, the filename in the DHCP config must begin with F_TS-419P2+. strings mtd4 file did not show anything useful, but this name was requested via DHCP, visible in tcpdump -vv. Fixed, thanks! -- Martin

Bug#693263: qcontrol: wheezy version of qcontrol does not support --direct

2013-01-03 Thread Martin Michlmayr
I just installed the test package on my TS-219 (which doesn't have the watchdog problem). The device booted fine but I saw the following error: | Error opening /dev/input/by-path/platform-gpio-keys-event: No such file or directory which makes me wonder whether qcontrol was really executed

Bug#693263: qcontrol: wheezy version of qcontrol does not support --direct

2013-01-03 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 10:17 +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: I just installed the test package on my TS-219 (which doesn't have the watchdog problem). The device booted fine but I saw the following error: | Error opening /dev/input/by-path/platform-gpio-keys-event: No such file or directory

Bug#693263: qcontrol: wheezy version of qcontrol does not support --direct

2013-01-02 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2013-01-01 at 13:18 +0100, Hanno Hecker wrote: On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 10:37:17 +0100 Hanno Hecker hah+deb...@uu-x.de wrote: I'm not sure what happened, but I had to use the recovery boot to get a running system again. The watchdog did not trigger, so it stayed up, but it did not boot

Bug#693263: qcontrol: wheezy version of qcontrol does not support --direct

2013-01-01 Thread Hanno Hecker
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 08:12:33 + Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote: On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 14:48 +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: Might be better to backport --direct instead. This turned out to be relatively simple, thanks for the hint. Hanno, Could you try the packages at

Bug#693263: qcontrol: wheezy version of qcontrol does not support --direct

2013-01-01 Thread Hanno Hecker
On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 10:37:17 +0100 Hanno Hecker hah+deb...@uu-x.de wrote: I'm not sure what happened, but I had to use the recovery boot to get a running system again. The watchdog did not trigger, so it stayed up, but it did not boot full, IIRC the only open port was 111/tcp (portmapper). No

Bug#693263: qcontrol: wheezy version of qcontrol does not support --direct

2012-12-31 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 14:48 +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk [2012-12-29 14:20]: qcommand is probably right thing to use even in the Sid version, I believe qcommand only exists in the udeb, so this won't work. Might be better to backport --direct instead.

Bug#693263: qcontrol: wheezy version of qcontrol does not support --direct

2012-12-29 Thread Hanno Hecker
Package: qcontrol Followup-For: Bug #693263 Dear Maintainer, the qcontrol initramfs script /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-bottom/qcontrol tries to execute /sbin/qcontrol --direct watchdog off but the wheezy version (0.4.2-7+wheezy1) does not know about the --direct switch, so the

Bug#693263: qcontrol: wheezy version of qcontrol does not support --direct

2012-12-29 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 14:36 +0100, Hanno Hecker wrote: the qcontrol initramfs script /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-bottom/qcontrol tries to execute /sbin/qcontrol --direct watchdog off but the wheezy version (0.4.2-7+wheezy1) does not know about the --direct switch, so the script

Bug#693263: qcontrol: wheezy version of qcontrol does not support --direct

2012-12-29 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk [2012-12-29 14:20]: qcommand is probably right thing to use even in the Sid version, I believe qcommand only exists in the udeb, so this won't work. Might be better to backport --direct instead. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#693263: qcontrol: wheezy version of qcontrol does not support --direct

2012-12-29 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 14:48 +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk [2012-12-29 14:20]: qcommand is probably right thing to use even in the Sid version, I believe qcommand only exists in the udeb, so this won't work. Might be better to backport --direct instead.

Bug#693263: qcontrol: wheezy version of qcontrol does not support --direct

2012-12-29 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 14:48 +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk [2012-12-29 14:20]: qcommand is probably right thing to use even in the Sid version, I believe qcommand only exists in the udeb, so this won't work. Might be better to backport --direct instead.