On 2014-01-28 13:52, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 08:35:02PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
(Changing the module filename would work.)
which seems to me much better than a ugly hack such as the proposed one.
But I have no idea how much one needs to hack around in
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 08:35:02PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Won't work. Even if you ensure via Conflicts/Pre-Depends that the buggy
package gets removed, the postrm script will stay around. You cannot force a
package to be purged.
(Changing the module filename would work.)
which seems
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 02:02:30PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 13:06:47 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
what are your deprecation plans for dpkg-query --control-path?
This is an actual use-case that requires --control-path in wheezy and
jessie. Or is there a
On Monday, 27. January 2014 16:22:06 Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
Old postrm is broken and will play havoc after the new package was
unpacked. Therefore we have to delete it in the new preinst.
I wonder if the correct fix would be simply moving the Breaks/Replaces in
the proftpd-basic
Hi Guillem,
what are your deprecation plans for dpkg-query --control-path?
This is an actual use-case that requires --control-path in wheezy and
jessie. Or is there a better way to achieve this with dpkg?
Old postrm is broken and will play havoc after the new package was
unpacked. Therefore we
Hi!
On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 13:06:47 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
what are your deprecation plans for dpkg-query --control-path?
This is an actual use-case that requires --control-path in wheezy and
jessie. Or is there a better way to achieve this with dpkg?
Old postrm is broken and will
Followup-For: Bug #699647
Control: tag -1 pending
Hi,
I have now prepared a NMU and will upload this to DELAYED/2.
Please let me know if I should delay it longer.
I plan to get a corresponding fix into the next wheezy point release.
Andreas
diff -Nru proftpd-dfsg-1.3.5~rc3/debian/changelog
Hi Andreas,
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 04:04:38AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
+if [ $1 = install ] || [ $1 = upgrade ]
+then
+ if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt-nl 0.3-1+deb7u1
+ then
+ rm -fv $(dpkg-query --control-path proftpd-mod-geoip postrm)
+ fi
+fi
+
Followup-For: Bug #699647
Control: found -1 1.3.5~rc3-2.1
The problem is still present and this time I dug into it and analyzed
the real cause: the insane postrm script in 0.3-1, see #726742
Adding Breaks/Replaces against a package itself is useless, so drop them
again.
To fix this, add a
Followup-For: Bug #699647
The problem is still reproducible on upgrades from wheezy to sid.
The Package relationships are not correct:
Package: proftpd-mod-geoip
Version: 1.3.5~rc3-2
Replaces: proftpd-mod-geoip ( 1.3.5)
Breaks: proftpd-mod-geoip ( 1.3.5)
that needs to be ( 1.3.5~rc1)
Andreas
Package: proftpd-mod-geoip
Version: 1.3.5~rc1-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package deletes a file it has
shipped.
debsums reports modification of the following files,
from the attached log (scroll to the
11 matches
Mail list logo
