user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 706045 + wheezy-can-defer
tags 706045 + wheezy-ignore
thanks
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 07:16 +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 28.04.2013 18:28, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
Indeed. From the release perspective, however, the question we're
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk).
usertags 706045 + wheezy-can-defer
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: wheezy-can-defer.
tags 706045 +
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 28.04.2013 09:07, schrieb Tomas Pospisek:
I have had a look at the patch and as an outsider to the fetchmail code
that is not a maintaner of fetchmail am personaly not comfortable with
it. The problem is that the patched code in question is
Am 29.04.2013 09:28, schrieb Tomas Pospisek:
To be specific:
1436: SockRead(sock, inbufp, sizeof(buf)-4-(inbufp-buf)))
This can not overflow.
1467: inbufp[len++] = '\r';
Can overflow if inbufp[len] outside of 'buf'. Can we prove that
inbufp[len] does not
@Vitezslav Crhonek: I'm Cc:ing you here. Maybe you did a review of
the patch and I hope you can maybe shed some more light on the discussion
below.
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 08:52 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
* Tomas Pospisek t...@sourcepole.ch
On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 09:07 +0200, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I do wonder how many people this actually affects if it's been known
about since 2011 and not reported to Debian before.
The problem occurs only, if the user sets the mimedecode option.
Am 28.04.2013 18:28, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
Indeed. From the release perspective, however, the question we're
concerned with is whether the issue is severe enough that it /must/ be
fixed before the release.
If it only occurs when a non-default option is used and has affected
fetchmail
Am 28.04.2013 09:07, schrieb Tomas Pospisek:
I have had a look at the patch and as an outsider to the fetchmail code
that is not a maintaner of fetchmail am personaly not comfortable with
it. The problem is that the patched code in question is allready twisted
enough, it's in very large part
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 08:52 +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
* Tomas Pospisek t...@sourcepole.ch [2013-04-25 11:29]:
This bug being a RC blocker: is anyone of the fetchmail maintainers working
on
this bug (mimedecode option drops last message line if it is
unterminated)?
Shall I try to
Hi,
* Tomas Pospisek t...@sourcepole.ch [2013-04-25 11:29]:
This bug being a RC blocker: is anyone of the fetchmail maintainers working
on
this bug (mimedecode option drops last message line if it is unterminated)?
Shall I try to integrate the patch and do a NMU?
*t
Feel free, otherwise
10 matches
Mail list logo
