Processing control commands:
tags -1 + patch
Bug #741288 [src:seqan] seqan: FTBFS on many buildds due to RAM exhaustion
Added tag(s) patch.
--
741288: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=741288
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hello,
I was able to avoid this error and successfully build seqan on both mips and
mipsel,
adding flags -O0 -mxgot.
-O0 was added to solve issue:
virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory
during compilation of pair_align.cpp.
-mxgot was added to lift the
Hi Charles,
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 07:38:51AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:31:47PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
It seems reducing optimisation in d/rules [...] did not really help (perhaps
even droping -O1 could be tried but I doubt this).
Hello everybody,
Source: seqan
Version: 1.4.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
it seems your package is eating too much RAM for breakfast:
| cd /«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-arm-linux-gnueabihf/core/apps/pair_align
/usr/bin/c++ -DSEQAN_ENABLE_TESTING=0 -DSEQAN_HAS_EXECINFO=1
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
Hi KiBi,
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 09:06:51PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Source: seqan
Version: 1.4.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
it seems your package is eating too much RAM for breakfast:
| cd /«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-arm-linux-gnueabihf/core/apps/pair_align
/usr/bin/c++
Le Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:31:47PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
It seems reducing optimisation in d/rules [...] did not really help (perhaps
even droping -O1 could be tried but I doubt this).
Hello everybody,
I would also recommend to not make the program slower by design, unless you
want
6 matches
Mail list logo
