On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:42:23PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 03/13/2014 09:44 PM, Clint Adams wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 01:11:16AM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
Well, nope. libgnutls28 still links against libgmp10 which is still LGPL3+.
Unless I'm missing something that
Control: clone 741568 -2
Control: reassign -2 gmp
Control: retitle -2 please merge GMP's upstream licensing changes
On 03/14/2014 06:29 AM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:42:23PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 03/13/2014 09:44 PM, Clint Adams wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14,
Processing control commands:
clone 741568 -2
Bug #741568 [libcurl4-gnutls-dev] lack of symbol versioning and gnutls mismatch
results in problem
Bug 741568 cloned as bug 741607
741607 was not blocked by any bugs.
741607 was blocking: 741557
Added blocking bug(s) of 741607: 741557
reassign -2
On 03/14/2014 06:29 AM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
Avoid making git unredistributable doesn't sound that silly to me (having
these kind of problems in the first place kind of is though).
There's also the chance that switching to libgnutls28 would break packages
that
directly or indirectly
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 09:25:19AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Clint, another option is for you to rebuild libmsv against
libcurl4-nss-dev until the libcurl4-gnutls mishegas is sorted out. the
Thanks for this idea; I have done so.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: libcurl4-gnutls-dev
Version: 7.35.0-1
Severity: critical
Control: block 741557 by -1
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 06:25:14PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
I agree with the suggestion that libcurl3-gnutls (or libcurl4-gnutls?
that's the stated build-dep for libmsv) should switch to
On gio, mar 13, 2014 at 10:54:10 +, Clint Adams wrote:
Package: libcurl4-gnutls-dev
Version: 7.35.0-1
Severity: critical
Control: block 741557 by -1
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 06:25:14PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
I agree with the suggestion that libcurl3-gnutls (or
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 01:11:16AM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
Well, nope. libgnutls28 still links against libgmp10 which is still LGPL3+.
Unless I'm missing something that would make git (GPL2only) unredistributable.
So no, that's not actually possible (again, unless I'm missing
On 03/13/2014 09:44 PM, Clint Adams wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 01:11:16AM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
Well, nope. libgnutls28 still links against libgmp10 which is still LGPL3+.
Unless I'm missing something that would make git (GPL2only)
unredistributable.
So no, that's not actually
9 matches
Mail list logo