Processed: Re: Bug#742405: zookeeper ftbfs without openjdk

2014-04-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: severity -1 important Bug #742405 [src:zookeeper] zookeeper: ftbfs when gcj is default jdk Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 742405: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742405 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#742405: zookeeper ftbfs without openjdk

2014-04-27 Thread Ivo De Decker
Control: severity -1 important Hi, On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:15:43PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: On 30/03/14 20:28, Tim Retout wrote: Right, but this does not comply with the Java policy, which requires default-jdk as the build dependency Thanks for pointing this out. I hadn't

Bug#742405: zookeeper ftbfs without openjdk

2014-03-30 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Control: tags 742405 + patch On 28/03/14 20:30, Steven Chamberlain wrote: This doesn't seem right to me. zookeeper ftbfs without openjdk sounds like a build dependency should be more specific - instead of depending on default-jdk (which may or may not be suitable). Yes, it builds fine if the

Processed: Re: Bug#742405: zookeeper ftbfs without openjdk

2014-03-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tags 742405 + patch Bug #742405 [src:zookeeper] zookeeper: ftbfs when gcj is default jdk Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #742405 to the same tags previously set -- 742405: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742405 742544:

Processed: Re: Bug#742405: zookeeper ftbfs without openjdk

2014-03-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tags 742405 + patch Bug #742405 [src:zookeeper] zookeeper: ftbfs when gcj is default jdk Added tag(s) patch. -- 742405: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742405 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To

Bug#742405: zookeeper ftbfs without openjdk

2014-03-30 Thread Tim Retout
On 30 Mar 2014 20:16, Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org wrote: Control: tags 742405 + patch On 28/03/14 20:30, Steven Chamberlain wrote: This doesn't seem right to me. zookeeper ftbfs without openjdk sounds like a build dependency should be more specific - instead of depending on

Bug#742405: zookeeper ftbfs without openjdk

2014-03-30 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 30/03/14 20:28, Tim Retout wrote: Right, but this does not comply with the Java policy, which requires default-jdk as the build dependency Thanks for pointing this out. I hadn't seen the rest of the thread on debian-java@. The versioned dependency and the removal of kfreebsd-* and sparc

Bug#742405: zookeeper ftbfs without openjdk

2014-03-28 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi, On 24/03/14 22:42, Tim Retout wrote: In the absence of any other suggestions, I've filed http://bugs.debian.org/742544 to request removal of the binaries from the architectures where zookeeper fails to build. Once that's done, I'll drop the severity of this bug. This doesn't seem right

Bug#742405: zookeeper ftbfs without openjdk

2014-03-24 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hi Tim, On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 08:42:08PM +, Tim Retout wrote: Zookeeper also fails to build on sparc. These seem to be the architectures where openjdk is not the default JDK. This would explain why 3.4.5+dfsg-1 built successfully, because openjdk was the default on kfreebsd between

Bug#742405: zookeeper ftbfs without openjdk

2014-03-24 Thread Tim Retout
In the absence of any other suggestions, I've filed http://bugs.debian.org/742544 to request removal of the binaries from the architectures where zookeeper fails to build. Once that's done, I'll drop the severity of this bug. Kind regards, On 24 March 2014 06:29, Ivo De Decker

Bug#742405: zookeeper ftbfs without openjdk

2014-03-23 Thread Tim Retout
Zookeeper also fails to build on sparc. These seem to be the architectures where openjdk is not the default JDK. This would explain why 3.4.5+dfsg-1 built successfully, because openjdk was the default on kfreebsd between November and February. I'm not actually sure how best to resolve this...