On 26 September 2014 14:21, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 13:41:40 +0200, demerphq wrote:
>
> > > > You are definitely my favourite person of the week. Thank you SO
> MUCH. I
> > > > stared at that source for hours looking for this, and I missed it
> every
> > > > time.
>
> Yay!
>
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 13:41:40 +0200, demerphq wrote:
> > > You are definitely my favourite person of the week. Thank you SO MUCH. I
> > > stared at that source for hours looking for this, and I missed it every
> > > time.
Yay!
> > > Let me roll a new release and we can celebrate together a debian
On 26 September 2014 12:53, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:40:12PM +0200, demerphq wrote:
>
> > You are definitely my favourite person of the week. Thank you SO MUCH. I
> > stared at that source for hours looking for this, and I missed it every
> > time.
>
> Yeah, I needed quite a
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:40:12PM +0200, demerphq wrote:
> You are definitely my favourite person of the week. Thank you SO MUCH. I
> stared at that source for hours looking for this, and I missed it every
> time.
Yeah, I needed quite a few hours with gdb to find it. Code glaring wasn't
working
On 26 September 2014 12:33, Niko Tyni wrote:
> tag 742409 patch
> thanks
>
>
You are definitely my favourite person of the week. Thank you SO MUCH. I
stared at that source for hours looking for this, and I missed it every
time.
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 03:57:24PM +0200, demerphq wrote:
> > On
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 742409 patch
Bug #742409 [libsereal-encoder-perl] libsereal-encoder-perl: FTBFS on some
architectures
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
742409: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
tag 742409 patch
thanks
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 03:57:24PM +0200, demerphq wrote:
> On 17 September 2014 07:52, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > So I suspect it's a general 64-bit big-endian problem.
> I was under the impression that Jarkko got Sereal to work on big-endian 64
> bit HPUX. But maybe I am wro
On 17 September 2014 07:52, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:24:35PM +0200, demerphq wrote:
>
> > Well I am wondering if you can look the patch I referenced above and see
> if
> > you can work out what you need to do to get s390x to do the right thing?
> As
> > you have identified yo
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:24:35PM +0200, demerphq wrote:
> Well I am wondering if you can look the patch I referenced above and see if
> you can work out what you need to do to get s390x to do the right thing? As
> you have identified yourself this is clearly a problem with the snappy
> support.
On 16 September 2014 21:06, Niko Tyni wrote:
> (Cc'ing Yves instead of the scary github address as he
> explicitly asked for that in the upstream ticket.)
>
>
Thanks. :-)
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 05:06:29PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:03:56 -0700, Yves Orton wrote
(Cc'ing Yves instead of the scary github address as he
explicitly asked for that in the upstream ticket.)
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 05:06:29PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:03:56 -0700, Yves Orton wrote:
> > This is so frustrating. Is there anyone in the Debian community t
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:03:56 -0700, Yves Orton wrote:
> >> > Just released a new version. 3.001_003
> >> > It takes the approach that everything but I86 needs aligned loads.
> I could cry. I think I made things worse. :-(
Don't give up :)
> This is so frustrating. Is there anyone in the Debian
On Thu, 15 May 2014 08:13:06 -0700, Yves Orton wrote:
> > > Anyway, I pushed this:
[..]
> > > Do we need to roll a release or can you build form git?
> > I can grab the commit from git and add it as a patch to the package.
> > ...
> > Hm, this is for _D_ecoder, whereas the failing package is _E_nc
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 13:26:22 -0700, Steffen Müller wrote:
> >> Bad news: 2.11 fails again:
> >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=libsereal-encoder-perl&ver=2.11-1
> >> This time with Decoder 2.08 installed and all tests run.
> >
> > This looks like a hard crash while running the tests
14 matches
Mail list logo
