On 11.10.2014 22:44, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
[...]
>
> Markus Koschany was kind enough to work on a patch, would you mind
> looking at it and possibly apply it?
Hi,
I have rebased the patch against the latest version of Transmission in unstable.
I agree with Andrei that this bug is not entirely f
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #718624 {Done: Thomas Goirand } [transmission-daemon]
transmission-daemon: segfaults with systemd due to erroneous maintainer scripts
Bug #742626 {Done: Thomas Goirand } [transmission-daemon]
transmission-daemon: segfaults with systemd due to erroneou
Control: reopen -1
Control: merge -1 754927
Hi Thomas,
Thanks a lot for looking into fixing bugs in transmission-daemon.
Unfortunately I have to reopen this bug (again) because the fix is...
incomplete:
1. Type in the .service file should be 'notify' (upstream .service file
is correct)
2. Be
On 08/04/2014 13:09, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Updated patch is attached.
It works for me and fixed the problem. Even if my configuration is a modified
settings.json with not
the default download directory.
--
François Bobot
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
On 08.04.2014 10:30, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 07 apr 14, 20:03:51, Markus Koschany wrote:
>>
>> Here is the changelog:
> ...
>> * transmission-daemon.postrm:
>> - Also delete debian-transmission user when purging the daemon.
>
> Didn't get the chance to test your patch, but this caught
On Lu, 07 apr 14, 20:03:51, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
> Here is the changelog:
...
> * transmission-daemon.postrm:
> - Also delete debian-transmission user when purging the daemon.
Didn't get the chance to test your patch, but this caught my eye. As far
as I recall the consensus was that re
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 718624 transmission-daemon: segfaults with systemd due to erroneous
> maintainer scripts
Bug #718624 [transmission-daemon] transmission-daemon: segfaults with systemd
enabled due to erroneous service file
Bug #742626 [transmission-daemon
retitle 718624 transmission-daemon: segfaults with systemd due to erroneous
maintainer scripts
tags 718624 patch
thanks
On 07.04.2014 12:10, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
[...]
> If you build a package with your patch applied I'll try to do some
> testing.
>
Hello Andrei and Antoine,
thanks for offer
On Sb, 05 apr 14, 21:26:39, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
> thanks for testing. I will try to write a patch which implements these
> changes.
> Writing the patch is probably not the difficult part but rather to ensure
> that the upgrade path works and the changes won't cause any breakage.
>
> I won't
On 04.04.2014 19:57, Antoine wrote:
> On 04/03/2014 07:27 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
[...]
>> and try out different settings. It would be great if you confirmed that
>> the solutions mentioned in #718624 worked for you.
>
> Actually I didn't have to change anything at all in the service file
> aft
On 04/03/2014 07:27 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
> On 03.04.2014 18:20, Antoine wrote:
> [...]
>> In that case, I think bug #718624 gravity should be set to grave, as it
>> breaks the installation of the package through DPKG.
>
> I agree that this is a release critical issue thus the severity shoul
Processing control commands:
> tags 742626 - moreinfo
Bug #742626 [transmission-daemon] transmission-daemon: SEGFAULT on first run,
breaks installation
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #742626 to the same tags previously set
> severity -1 serious
Bug #742626 [transmission-daemon] transmissio
Processing control commands:
> tags 742626 - moreinfo
Bug #742626 [transmission-daemon] transmission-daemon: SEGFAULT on first run,
breaks installation
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> severity -1 serious
Bug #718624 [transmission-daemon] [transmission-daemon] systemd unit is
erroneous (wrong user and
Control: tags 742626 - moreinfo
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: merge 718624 742626
On 03.04.2014 18:20, Antoine wrote:
[...]
> In that case, I think bug #718624 gravity should be set to grave, as it
> breaks the installation of the package through DPKG.
I agree that this is a release criti
On 04/03/2014 12:53 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I believe this is the same bug as described in
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/718624
In that case, I think bug #718624 gravity should be set to grave, as it
breaks the installation of the package through D
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hello,
I believe this is the same bug as described in
https://bugs.debian.org/718624
Can you confirm that the segfaults do not happen when you run
transmission-daemon
without systemd but simply with the provided sysv-rc init scripts?
Regards,
Markus
signature.as
Package: transmission-daemon
Version: 2.82-1.1
Severity: grave
Dear Maintainer,
When installing transmission-daemon from APT on a Jessie/Sid with
systemd enabled,
dpkg fails with:
Setting up transmission-daemon (2.82-1.1) ...
Job for transmission-daemon.service failed. See 'systemctl status
tran
17 matches
Mail list logo
