Bug#764732: gcc-4.9: broken -O2 optimizations on armhf

2014-12-25 Thread Matthias Klose
Control: tags -1 + help this is not seen on the gcc-4.9 Linaro branch, so a ARM porter should identify the relevant backport. On 12/25/2014 06:12 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: the escalation is wrong. there exist several workarounds for it (lowering the optimization, using gcc-4.8, ...). I asked

Processed: Re: Bug#764732: gcc-4.9: broken -O2 optimizations on armhf

2014-12-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tags -1 + help Bug #764732 [gcc-4.9] gcc-4.9: broken -O2 optimizations on armhf Added tag(s) help. -- 764732: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=764732 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#764732: gcc-4.9: broken -O2 optimizations on armhf

2014-12-25 Thread peter green
Matthias Klose wrote: there exist several workarounds for it (lowering the optimization, using gcc-4.8, ...). Disabling stack protector also seems to result in a succesful compile (reducing it from strong to regular does not). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#764732: gcc-4.9: broken -O2 optimizations on armhf

2014-12-25 Thread peter green
peter green wrote: Matthias Klose wrote: there exist several workarounds for it (lowering the optimization, using gcc-4.8, ...). Disabling stack protector also seems to result in a succesful compile (reducing it from strong to regular does not). And another workaround is to use -marm. --

Bug#764732: gcc-4.9: broken -O2 optimizations on armhf

2014-12-24 Thread Matthias Klose
the escalation is wrong. there exist several workarounds for it (lowering the optimization, using gcc-4.8, ...). I asked the ARM porters to address this properly (Hector on IRC agreed to forward this), however I don't see any progress here. Now CCing debian-arm explicitly. On 12/23/2014 11:48 AM,