On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 11:29:32 +0100 Beck, Andre b...@ibh.de wrote:
Hi,
isn't that a bug in e2fsck anyway? There is accept_time_fudge which
defaults to true and should take care of this situation.
Possibly; in any case it still logs a warning even when it 'accepts' the
incorrect time. I don't
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 03:14:53 +0100 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
wrote:
By the way, Lennart Poettering told me that other distributions have
done that, though I haven't checked whether it is done with a
configuration file or a patch to the code.
it wouldn't be better to just skip the
Michael Biebl [2015-03-29 4:29 +0200]:
I was wondering, if an alternative to disabling the superblock time
check in e2fsprogs, it wouldn't be better to just skip the fsck of /
(and /usr, if separate).
For that, initramfs-tools could create a flag file for / and /usr in
/run and we'd update
On Sun, 2015-03-29 at 04:29 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Hi Ben!
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 22:51:53 + Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
wrote:
Package: e2fsprogs
Version: 1.42.12-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
We discussed this previously in person, but unfortunately the
Am 31.03.2015 um 04:14 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
On Sun, 2015-03-29 at 04:29 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 22:51:53 + Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
I was wondering, if an alternative to disabling the superblock time
check in e2fsprogs,
Well, it dawned to me, that doing
Hi Ben!
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 22:51:53 + Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
wrote:
Package: e2fsprogs
Version: 1.42.12-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
We discussed this previously in person, but unfortunately the proposed
solution doesn't work.
The plan for jessie (yes I know
Hi,
isn't that a bug in e2fsck anyway? There is accept_time_fudge which
defaults to true and should take care of this situation. Even when it
wouldn't default to true, my e2fsck.conf already had its alias
buggy_init_scripts set to 1. Nevertheless, I'm briefly seeing an fsck
running now on every
7 matches
Mail list logo
