Bug#779482: severity of 779482 is grave

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 11:44:48AM +0100, pini wrote: > Control: tag -1 pending > > Hi, > > On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 14:12:26 +0200 Gilles Filippini wrote: > > The release 2.3.2-1 in experimental was finally tested on a baremetal > > ppc64el machine, and it works [1]. Many thanks to

Processed: Re: Bug#779482: severity of 779482 is grave

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #779482 [libgluegen2-rt-java] support for powerpc, ppc64el and s390x not complete Added tag(s) pending. -- 779482: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779482 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#779482: severity of 779482 is grave

Control: tag -1 pending Hi, On Sat, 17 Oct 2015 14:12:26 +0200 Gilles Filippini wrote: > The release 2.3.2-1 in experimental was finally tested on a baremetal > ppc64el machine, and it works [1]. Many thanks to Frédéric Bonnard. > > [1]

Bug#779482: severity of 779482 is grave

On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 17:42:23 +0200 Markus Koschany wrote: > Control: forwarded -1 https://jogamp.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1246 > > On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 23:53:17 +0200 Gilles Filippini wrote: > > For the record, I've pinged upstream and proposed a patch for

Processed: Re: Bug#779482: severity of 779482 is grave

Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://jogamp.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1246 Bug #779482 [libgluegen2-rt-java] support for powerpc, ppc64el and s390x not complete Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://jogamp.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1246'. -- 779482:

Bug#779482: severity of 779482 is grave

Control: forwarded -1 https://jogamp.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1246 On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 23:53:17 +0200 Gilles Filippini wrote: > For the record, I've pinged upstream and proposed a patch for ppc64el. > The good news is they seem responsive [1]. > > [1]

Bug#779482: severity of 779482 is grave

For the record, I've pinged upstream and proposed a patch for ppc64el. The good news is they seem responsive [1]. [1] Unfortunately I couldn't test the usability of my patch yet, because I didn't succeed with remote X display on ppc64el

Bug#779482: severity of 779482 is grave

On Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:10:40 +0200 Gilles Filippini wrote: > Setting back severity to grave because ppc64el is an official > architecture since novembre 2014 and there is no point in providing > gluegen2 for ppc64el if it is unusable. On the other hand, the affected

Bug#779482: severity of 779482 is grave

Am 05.10.2015 um 12:07 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > On Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:10:40 +0200 Gilles Filippini wrote: > >> Setting back severity to grave because ppc64el is an official >> architecture since novembre 2014 and there is no point in providing >> gluegen2 for ppc64el if it is

Bug#779482: severity of 779482 is grave

Le 05/10/2015 12:18, Markus Koschany a écrit : > I think we should determine if upstream supports ppc64el. If not, it is > reasonable to remove ppc64el and other affected ports from the > Architecture field. I don't know, for some packages we do not exclude the unsupported architectures

Bug#779482: severity of 779482 is grave

Am 05.10.2015 um 12:48 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Le 05/10/2015 12:18, Markus Koschany a écrit : > >> I think we should determine if upstream supports ppc64el. If not, it is >> reasonable to remove ppc64el and other affected ports from the >> Architecture field. > > I don't know, for some

Bug#779482: severity of 779482 is grave

Markus Koschany a écrit le 05/10/2015 13:02 : > Am 05.10.2015 um 12:48 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: >> Le 05/10/2015 12:18, Markus Koschany a écrit : > I think it's ok to initially build with arch:any as long as there is > sufficient support from upstream. However if it turns out that some >