Bug#787398: Stable update? Bug#787398 (evolution-data-server: SMTP connection lost while reading message data)

2015-09-06 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2015, 09:58 +0200 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: > unfortunately, I had no luck convincing the SRM to accept my proposed e > -d-s update in Jessie in #789429. I didn't even receive a singly reply > after ~2 months. Maybe one of you wants to try his luck with it? So, 8.2 has been

Bug#787398: Stable update? Bug#787398 (evolution-data-server: SMTP connection lost while reading message data)

2015-08-18 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Hi there, Am Montag, den 15.06.2015, 10:46 +0200 schrieb Josselin Mouette: I put 3.12.11 in unstable precisely so that it gets a little testing, and I’d indeed like to see it in 8.2 if the diff is acceptable. unfortunately, I had no luck convincing the SRM to accept my proposed e -d-s update

Bug#787398: Stable update? Bug#787398 (evolution-data-server: SMTP connection lost while reading message data)

2015-06-16 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 15/06/15 12:28, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Am Montag, den 15.06.2015, 10:56 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: OK. But beware of http://bugs.debian.org/787624 when trying to push this to jessie. So, there are two package revisions +deb8u{1,2} that are currently missing from the jessie

Bug#787398: Stable update? Bug#787398 (evolution-data-server: SMTP connection lost while reading message data)

2015-06-15 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am Montag, den 15.06.2015, 10:56 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: OK. But beware of http://bugs.debian.org/787624 when trying to push this to jessie. So, there are two package revisions +deb8u{1,2} that are currently missing from the jessie branch in SVN, right? What is the gbp

Bug#787398: Stable update? Bug#787398 (evolution-data-server: SMTP connection lost while reading message data)

2015-06-15 Thread Josselin Mouette
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote: Is there anything else we want to get into stable? Should we try to get 3.12.11 in, any expectations with regard to SRM approval for upstream point updates? You can try. It may depend on how big the

Bug#787398: Stable update? Bug#787398 (evolution-data-server: SMTP connection lost while reading message data)

2015-06-15 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 15/06/15 10:46, Josselin Mouette wrote: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org wrote: Is there anything else we want to get into stable? Should we try to get 3.12.11 in, any expectations with regard to SRM approval for upstream point updates?

Bug#787398: Stable update? Bug#787398 (evolution-data-server: SMTP connection lost while reading message data)

2015-06-15 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 15/06/15 07:53, Fabian Greffrath wrote: Hi Emilio, Am Freitag, den 12.06.2015, 19:54 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: There's already a branch in pkg-evolution/jessie/evolution-data -server/. Use that, build and test the packages in jessie, then open a p-u bug against

Bug#787398: Stable update? Bug#787398 (evolution-data-server: SMTP connection lost while reading message data)

2015-06-14 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Hi Emilio, Am Freitag, den 12.06.2015, 19:54 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: There's already a branch in pkg-evolution/jessie/evolution-data -server/. Use that, build and test the packages in jessie, then open a p-u bug against release.debian.org with a debdiff from jessie attached.

Bug#787398: Stable update? Bug#787398 (evolution-data-server: SMTP connection lost while reading message data)

2015-06-12 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi Fabian, On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 21:18:59 +0200 Fabian Greffrath fab...@debian.org wrote: Dear pkg-evolution, this bug is present in the versions of e-d-s/libcamel currently in unstable/testing and stable. It is really severe as it prevents mails from being sent without evolution (and thus

Bug#787398: Stable update? Bug#787398 (evolution-data-server: SMTP connection lost while reading message data)

2015-06-09 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Dear pkg-evolution, this bug is present in the versions of e-d-s/libcamel currently in unstable/testing and stable. It is really severe as it prevents mails from being sent without evolution (and thus the user) taking any notice of it. It thus may cause (and already has for me) silent data loss.