Your message dated Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:51:08 +0800
with message-id <1440409868.13933.10.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#787796: fenics fresh installation is broken
has caused the Debian Bug report #787796,
regarding fenics fresh installation is broken
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
787796: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787796
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: fenics
Version: 1:1.5.0.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
a fresh install of fenics yields a broken environment.
In fact, the command "from dolfin import *" in an ipython terminal
returns the backtrace you can find in the attachment.
The problem might be due to a version mismatch in one of the
dependencies [I remember there was little mess during the migration from
1.4.0 to 1.5.0].
Best regards,
Massimiliano Leoni
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing-updates
APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'),
(500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (500,
'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages fenics depends on:
ii dolfin-bin 1.5.0-2
ii dolfin-doc 1.5.0-2
ii libdolfin-dev 1.5.0-2
ii python-dolfin 1.5.0-2
ii python-ffc 1.5.0-3
ii python-fiat 1.5.0-1
ii python-instant 1.5.0-1
ii python-ufl 1.5.0-1
ii python-ufl-doc 1.5.0-1
Versions of packages fenics recommends:
ii python-scitools 0.9.0-2
fenics suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
In [1]: from dolfin import *
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ValueError Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-1-f9fe29351801> in <module>()
----> 1 from dolfin import *
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/dolfin/__init__.pyc in <module>()
14
15 # Import names from the compiled cpp modules
---> 16 from . import cpp
17 from dolfin.cpp import *
18 from dolfin.cpp import __version__, __swigversion__, __pythonversion__
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/dolfin/cpp/__init__.py in <module>()
40
41 # Import the module
---> 42 exec("from . import %s" % module_name)
43 module = globals()[module_name]
44
<string> in <module>()
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/dolfin/cpp/common.py in <module>()
108 __swigversion__ = "%d.%d.%d"%(tuple(map(int, [tmp[-5], tmp[-3],
tmp[-2:]])))
109 tmp = hex(dolfin_pythonversion())
--> 110 __pythonversion__ = "%d.%d.%d"%(tuple(map(int, [tmp[2], tmp[4],
tmp[6]])))
111 del tmp, dolfin_pythonversion, dolfin_swigversion
112
ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: 'a'
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This sounds like bug #786857, which is now fixed in dolfin (python
-dolfin) 1.5.0-3.
--- End Message ---
