Bug#791964: gdm3: upgrade causes X session to be terminated

2015-07-24 Thread Michael Biebl
Control: severity -1 important Am 24.07.2015 um 14:22 schrieb Michael Biebl: On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 09:38:56 -0700 Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote: For a short-term fix, how about quickly re-introducing the gdm3 workaround? Then, we can experiment with possible ways to drop it and

Bug#791964: gdm3: upgrade causes X session to be terminated

2015-07-24 Thread Michael Biebl
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 09:38:56 -0700 Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org wrote: For a short-term fix, how about quickly re-introducing the gdm3 workaround? Then, we can experiment with possible ways to drop it and (more) carefully test the upgrade paths with packages that haven't been uploaded

Processed: Re: Bug#791964: gdm3: upgrade causes X session to be terminated

2015-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: severity -1 important Bug #791964 [gdm3] gdm3: upgrade causes X session to be terminated Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 791964: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791964 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#791964: gdm3: upgrade causes X session to be terminated

2015-07-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: severity -1 serious Bug #791964 [gdm3] gdm3: upgrade causes X session to be terminated Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' -- 791964: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791964 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#791964: gdm3: upgrade causes X session to be terminated

2015-07-10 Thread Michael Biebl
[keeping pkg-systemd into the loop here] Am 10.07.2015 um 14:37 schrieb Michael Biebl: I suggest we follow up on this bug report. I'm not yet quite sure, if this is a gdm or systemd bug and whether the best course of action is to simply re-introduce the workaround patch and drop that in

Bug#791964: gdm3: upgrade causes X session to be terminated

2015-07-10 Thread David Mohr
On 2015-07-10 10:46, Michael Biebl wrote: Am 10.07.2015 um 18:38 schrieb Josh Triplett: On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 02:37:49PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: * Systemd has been fixed in v222 to no longer kill services on reload if BusName is set, so drop that part from 92_systemd_unit.patch.

Bug#791964: gdm3: upgrade causes X session to be terminated

2015-07-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 10.07.2015 um 19:11 schrieb Josh Triplett: On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 06:46:18PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Am 10.07.2015 um 18:38 schrieb Josh Triplett: Note, though, that it doesn't help for systemd to be upgraded first. Even if running the new systemd 222, upgrading gdm3 kills the active

Bug#791964: gdm3: upgrade causes X session to be terminated

2015-07-10 Thread Josh Triplett
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 06:46:18PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Am 10.07.2015 um 18:38 schrieb Josh Triplett: On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 02:37:49PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Control: severity -1 serious Am 09.07.2015 um 20:14 schrieb David Mohr: Package: gdm3 Version: 3.14.2-1

Bug#791964: gdm3: upgrade causes X session to be terminated

2015-07-10 Thread Josh Triplett
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 02:37:49PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Control: severity -1 serious Am 09.07.2015 um 20:14 schrieb David Mohr: Package: gdm3 Version: 3.14.2-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, the changelog reads: * Systemd has been fixed in v222 to no longer kill

Bug#791964: gdm3: upgrade causes X session to be terminated

2015-07-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 10.07.2015 um 18:38 schrieb Josh Triplett: On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 02:37:49PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: Control: severity -1 serious Am 09.07.2015 um 20:14 schrieb David Mohr: Package: gdm3 Version: 3.14.2-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, the changelog reads: * Systemd has

Bug#791964: gdm3: upgrade causes X session to be terminated

2015-07-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 10.07.2015 um 18:38 schrieb Josh Triplett: On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 02:37:49PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: I'm not yet quite sure, if this is a gdm or systemd bug and whether the best course of action is to simply re-introduce the workaround patch and drop that in stretch+1 or if we drop the