Bug#797866: libtorrent: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5

2015-09-21 Thread Jose-Luis Rivas
On 21/09/15, 09:52am, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Wed, 09 Sep 2015 at 05:38:16 -0700, Jose-Luis Rivas wrote: > > The only reverse dependencies are rtorrent and it needs an upgrade as > > well since there's a newer upstream version (it's the same upstream) > > depending on the newer version of

Bug#797866: libtorrent: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5

2015-09-21 Thread Simon McVittie
On Wed, 09 Sep 2015 at 05:38:16 -0700, Jose-Luis Rivas wrote: > The only reverse dependencies are rtorrent and it needs an upgrade as > well since there's a newer upstream version (it's the same upstream) > depending on the newer version of libtorrent. > > Do I really need to do the transition or

Bug#797866: libtorrent: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5

2015-09-09 Thread Simon McVittie
On 09/09/15 07:00, Jose-Luis Rivas wrote: > On 08/09/15, 10:24pm, Jose-Luis Rivas wrote: >> Just to be clear, if I rebuild this with the source packages from >> unstable with a new upstream version the rename is not necessary? > > Nevermind, upstream bumped soname anyway. A new upstream SONAME

Bug#797866: libtorrent: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5

2015-09-09 Thread Jose-Luis Rivas
Nevermind, upstream bumped soname anyway. On 08/09/15, 10:24pm, Jose-Luis Rivas wrote: > Just to be clear, if I rebuild this with the source packages from > unstable with a new upstream version the rename is not necessary? > > On 03/09/15, 08:21am, Simon McVittie wrote: > > Source: libtorrent >

Bug#797866: libtorrent: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5

2015-09-09 Thread Jose-Luis Rivas
On 09/09/15, 07:30am, Simon McVittie wrote: > On 09/09/15 07:00, Jose-Luis Rivas wrote: > > On 08/09/15, 10:24pm, Jose-Luis Rivas wrote: > >> Just to be clear, if I rebuild this with the source packages from > >> unstable with a new upstream version the rename is not necessary? > > > > Nevermind,

Bug#797866: libtorrent: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5

2015-09-08 Thread Jose-Luis Rivas
Just to be clear, if I rebuild this with the source packages from unstable with a new upstream version the rename is not necessary? On 03/09/15, 08:21am, Simon McVittie wrote: > Source: libtorrent > Version: 0.13.2-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: breaks ABI without a package rename > Tags:

Processed: Re: Bug#797866: libtorrent: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5

2015-09-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 797866 confirmed Bug #797866 [src:libtorrent] libtorrent: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5 Added tag(s) confirmed. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 797866: http://bugs.debian.org/c

Bug#797866: libtorrent: ABI transition needed for libstdc++ v5

2015-09-03 Thread Simon McVittie
Source: libtorrent Version: 0.13.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: breaks ABI without a package rename Tags: sid stretch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: libstdc++-cxx11 Background[1]: libstdc++6 introduces a new ABI to conform to the C++11 standard, but keeps the old ABI to not