Bug#818265: Bug#818187: Bug#818265: Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On 29.11.2016 15:10, Tobias Hansen wrote: > On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 20:25:23 +0100 Julian Taylor > wrote: >> On 03.11.2016 20:17, Sandro Tosi wrote: Looks like your last upload fixed the build on most architectures. However the package still failed to

Bug#818265: Bug#818187: Bug#818265: Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 20:25:23 +0100 Julian Taylor wrote: > On 03.11.2016 20:17, Sandro Tosi wrote: > >> Looks like your last upload fixed the build on most architectures. However > >> the > >> package still failed to build on arm64. > >> > >>

Bug#818265: Bug#818187: Bug#818265: Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On 03.11.2016 20:17, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> Looks like your last upload fixed the build on most architectures. However >> the >> package still failed to build on arm64. >> >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pyzmq > > Hey Julian, do you have time to look at the failures in the >

Bug#818265: Bug#818187: Bug#818265: Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

> Looks like your last upload fixed the build on most architectures. However the > package still failed to build on arm64. > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pyzmq Hey Julian, do you have time to look at the failures in the https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pyzmq ? it

Bug#818265: Bug#818187: Bug#818265: Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On 20/04/16 00:33, Julian Taylor wrote: > On 13.04.2016 15:39, Julian Taylor wrote: >> On 04/13/2016 03:24 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> On 29/03/16 19:10, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: Hi Julian, On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Julian Taylor

Bug#818265: Bug#818187: Bug#818265: Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On 13.04.2016 15:39, Julian Taylor wrote: On 04/13/2016 03:24 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 29/03/16 19:10, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: Hi Julian, On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: On 20.03.2016 11:11, László Böszörményi (GCS)

Bug#818265: Bug#818187: Bug#818265: Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On 13/04/16 15:39, Julian Taylor wrote: > On 04/13/2016 03:24 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 29/03/16 19:10, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: >>> Hi Julian, >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Julian Taylor >>> wrote: On 20.03.2016 11:11, László

Bug#818265: Bug#818187: Bug#818265: Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On 04/13/2016 03:24 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 29/03/16 19:10, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: >> Hi Julian, >> >> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Julian Taylor >> wrote: >>> On 20.03.2016 11:11, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: Sorry, my life was

Bug#818265: Bug#818187: Bug#818265: Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On 29/03/16 19:10, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > Hi Julian, > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Julian Taylor > wrote: >> On 20.03.2016 11:11, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: >>> Sorry, my life was chaotic. Yes and no, checked it. First, there's a >>> new

Bug#818265: Bug#818187: Bug#818265: Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

Hi Julian, On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: > On 20.03.2016 11:11, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: >> Sorry, my life was chaotic. Yes and no, checked it. First, there's a >> new upstream version of pyzmq (15.2) for two months. It seems to be

Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:59:44 0100 =?UTF-8?B?TMOhc3psw7MgQsO2c3rDtnJtw6lueWkgKEdDUyk=?= wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: > > On 21/03/16 19:59, Luca Boccassi wrote: > >> Given the change of the -dev package name here,

Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 21/03/16 19:59, Luca Boccassi wrote: >> Given the change of the -dev package name here, should I roll back and b-d >> again on libzmq3-dev? I don't mind doing another upload if it's the right >> thing. > >

Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On 21/03/16 19:59, Luca Boccassi wrote: > Given the change of the -dev package name here, should I roll back and b-d > again on libzmq3-dev? I don't mind doing another upload if it's the right > thing. Yes that'd be fine, but there's no rush. Cheers, Emilio

Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:26:15 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 14/03/16 22:03, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > On 14/03/16 21:55, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > >> wrote: > >>>

Bug#818265: Bug#818187: Bug#818265: Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: > On 20.03.2016 11:11, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort >> wrote: >>> Got a chance to look at this? >> Sorry, my life was chaotic.

Bug#818265: Bug#818187: Bug#818265: Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On 20.03.2016 11:11, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: >> On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 23:37:26 +0100 >> =?UTF-8?B?TMOhc3psw7MgQsO2c3rDtnJtw6lueWkgKEdDUyk=?= wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:24 PM,

Bug#818265: Bug#818187: Bug#818265: Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 23:37:26 +0100 > =?UTF-8?B?TMOhc3psw7MgQsO2c3rDtnJtw6lueWkgKEdDUyk=?= wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Julian Taylor >> wrote: >> >

Bug#818265: Bug#818187: Bug#818265: Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 23:37:26 +0100 =?UTF-8?B?TMOhc3psw7MgQsO2c3rDtnJtw6lueWkgKEdDUyk=?= wrote: On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: > On 15.03.2016 22:48, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: >> This is known to pyzmq

Bug#818265: Bug#818187: Bug#818265: Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Julian Taylor wrote: > On 15.03.2016 22:48, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: >> This is known to pyzmq upstream[1] for about three years. It happens >> on Ubuntu, Red Hat, CentOS and with ZeroMQ 4.0.x as well. While >>

Bug#818187: Bug#818265: Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On 15.03.2016 22:48, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: >> On 14/03/16 22:03, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> Looks good. No problem and thanks for reacting that fast! >> >> I scheduled the binNMUs last night and

Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 14/03/16 22:03, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Looks good. No problem and thanks for reacting that fast! > > I scheduled the binNMUs last night and things are going well. The only issue > seems to be pyzmq,

Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On 14/03/16 22:03, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 14/03/16 21:55, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Renaming a -dev package because the soname changed is bad. The only reason to do it in this case is so that

Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On 14/03/16 21:55, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Renaming a -dev package because the soname changed is bad. The only reason to do it in this case is so that things don't look "odd". The main reason the soname

Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Renaming a -dev package because the soname changed is bad. The only reason > to do it in this case is so that things don't look "odd". The main reason the soname is in the -dev package name is that the simple

Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On 14/03/16 20:19, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: On 14.03.2016 20:04, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: I've noted all depending package maintainers back then. Yes, didn't prevent the testing migration of zeromq3. But

Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 14.03.2016 20:04, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: >> I've noted all depending package maintainers back then. Yes, didn't >> prevent the testing migration of zeromq3. But some maintainers did the >> migration to

Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On 14.03.2016 20:04, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:24:38 +0100 Matthias Klose wrote: zeromq3 migrated to testing without any transition being done, leaving the cruft

Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:24:38 +0100 Matthias Klose wrote: >> zeromq3 migrated to testing without any transition being done, leaving the >> cruft >> packages libzmq3 and libzmq3-dev in the archive.

Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 19:24:38 +0100 Matthias Klose wrote: Package: src:zeromq3 Version: 4.1.4-6 Severity: serious Tags: sid stretch zeromq3 migrated to testing without any transition being done, leaving the cruft packages libzmq3 and libzmq3-dev in the archive. Now every b-d on

Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

Package: src:zeromq3 Version: 4.1.4-6 Severity: serious Tags: sid stretch zeromq3 migrated to testing without any transition being done, leaving the cruft packages libzmq3 and libzmq3-dev in the archive. Now every b-d on libzmq3-dev would need to be replaced with libzmq5-dev, or better rename