Packages can be decrufted/removed even if there are still rdeps around
(forcing the removal breaking the deps), though you need to convince an FTP
master that it's the right thing to do it. This is a good case where this
can be done as fw4spl is already broken enough by itself.
Actually I
Hi Mattia,
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 09:22:07 + Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> I didn't notice it, but the binary RM was already processed, so
> currently there are no fw4spl binaries in debian.
>
> So this is not really a problem anymore for us, yet of course we would
> like to see this completely
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 08:42:58PM +0200, Corentin Desfarges wrote:
> As I said to Andreas a few weeks ago, the FW4SPL team is currently
> working on a new version of the framework using VTK6, ITK4, and the
> new Boost version.
>
> We should be able to remove the dependences to the old versions
Hi
As I said to Andreas a few weeks ago, the FW4SPL team is currently
working on a new version of the framework using VTK6, ITK4, and the
new Boost version.
We should be able to remove the dependences to the old versions of
these packages over the next week.
About libpng, I'm not sure to
Package: fw4spl
Severity: serious
Justification: blocks-transitions
Dear maintainer / ftp-masters,
fw4spl is RC buggy with 5 bugs:
#797475 fw4spl: does not support parallel build
#797481 fw4spl: FTBFS - Doesn't support boost 1.58
#809935 fw4spl: FTBFS with libpng16
#820632 fw4spl: depends on
5 matches
Mail list logo
