Hi,
well done!
On 11/11/2016 13:06, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Danny,
>
> thanks again for your help.
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:36:49PM +0100, Danny Edel wrote:
>> Control: block 784451 by 832420
>>
>> that is fine with me. I'll keep the bugs in CC too.
> :-)
>
>>> We somehow should
Hi Danny,
thanks again for your help.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:36:49PM +0100, Danny Edel wrote:
> Control: block 784451 by 832420
>
> that is fine with me. I'll keep the bugs in CC too.
:-)
> > We somehow should target to Qt5 anyway (see #784451) better sooner than
> > later.
> >
>
>
Control: block 784451 by 832420
On 11/10/2016 09:13 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I take the freedom to turn this discussion into a public one
> and CC the relevant bugs to leave a record there that something is
> happening.
Hello Andreas,
that is fine with me. I'll keep the bugs in CC too.
>
Hi Danny,
thanks a lot for your quick response to analyse the problems in the ball
package. I take the freedom to turn this discussion into a public one
and CC the relevant bugs to leave a record there that something is
happening.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 03:26:30PM +0100, Danny Edel wrote:
> On
4 matches
Mail list logo
