On 10/10/16 14:01, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10/09/2016 11:02 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 10/09/2016 10:25 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>>> Now the same is going to happen with "powerpc" arch: libv8 is actually not
>>> compatible with all processors supported by debian (ppc64xx are ok,
On 10/09/2016 11:02 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10/09/2016 10:25 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> Now the same is going to happen with "powerpc" arch: libv8 is actually not
>> compatible with all processors supported by debian (ppc64xx are ok, though).
>>
>> Sebastiaan, i feel bad asking for your
On 10/09/2016 10:25 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Now the same is going to happen with "powerpc" arch: libv8 is actually not
> compatible with all processors supported by debian (ppc64xx are ok, though).
>
> Sebastiaan, i feel bad asking for your help again, but since you already
> filled all the RM bug
2016-10-06 12:24 GMT+02:00 Sebastiaan Couwenberg :
> On 10/06/2016 12:21 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > 2016-09-21 11:53 GMT+02:00 Sebastiaan Couwenberg :
> >
> >> On 09/21/2016 11:34 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> >>> 2016-09-21 10:24 GMT+02:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort :
> I see you dropped support for ar
On 10/06/2016 12:21 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> 2016-09-21 11:53 GMT+02:00 Sebastiaan Couwenberg :
>
>> On 09/21/2016 11:34 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>>> 2016-09-21 10:24 GMT+02:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort :
I see you dropped support for armel in #818552 and requested the removal
of the outdated a
2016-09-21 11:53 GMT+02:00 Sebastiaan Couwenberg :
> On 09/21/2016 11:34 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > 2016-09-21 10:24 GMT+02:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort :
> >> I see you dropped support for armel in #818552 and requested the removal
> >> of the outdated armel binaries. That's fine. However, nodejs doe
On 09/21/2016 11:34 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> 2016-09-21 10:24 GMT+02:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort :
>> I see you dropped support for armel in #818552 and requested the removal
>> of the outdated armel binaries. That's fine. However, nodejs doesn't
>> migrate to testing because the lack of armel binarie
2016-09-21 10:24 GMT+02:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort :
> Source: nodejs
> Version: 4.4.7~dfsg-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> I see you dropped support for armel in #818552 and requested the removal
> of the outdated armel binaries. That's fine. However, nodejs doesn't
> migrate to testing because
Source: nodejs
Version: 4.4.7~dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
I see you dropped support for armel in #818552 and requested the removal
of the outdated armel binaries. That's fine. However, nodejs doesn't
migrate to testing because the lack of armel binaries breaks a number
of packages that depend on
9 matches
Mail list logo