Bug#840189: fixed in texlive-extra 2016.20161103-1

Hi Andreas, > BTW, sorry for the trouble and thanks for your cooperation. No trouble, thanks for your great work on dblatex, much appreciated! Norbert -- PREINING Norbert + TeX Live & Debian Developer + http://www.preining.info GPG: 0x860CDC13fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0 ACF0 6CAC A448

Bug#840189: fixed in texlive-extra 2016.20161103-1

Norbert Preining wrote: > > fixed: the bug title says "dblatex (<< 0.3.9-1~)", but I can see for > > texlive-latex-extra 2016.20161103-1: > > > > Breaks: dblatex (<< 0.3.8-2~), [...] > > Well, when I committed the change it was 0.3.8-2~, and nobody informed > me that there

Bug#840189: fixed in texlive-extra 2016.20161103-1

> #840189 was the bug in dblatex itself (already closed in October). > This should have been #840229: Argg, indeed. > fixed: the bug title says "dblatex (<< 0.3.9-1~)", but I can see for > texlive-latex-extra 2016.20161103-1: > > Breaks: dblatex (<< 0.3.8-2~), [...] Well, when I committed the

Processed: Re: Bug#840189: fixed in texlive-extra 2016.20161103-1

Processing control commands: > notfixed 840189 texlive-extra/2016.20161103-1 Bug #840189 {Done: Norbert Preining } [dblatex] dblatex fails in pdflatex: Use of \@xmultirow doesn't match its definition Bug #840291 {Done: Norbert Preining } [dblatex]

Processed: Re: Bug#840189: fixed in texlive-extra 2016.20161103-1

Processing control commands: > notfixed 840189 texlive-extra/2016.20161103-1 Bug #840189 {Done: Norbert Preining } [dblatex] dblatex fails in pdflatex: Use of \@xmultirow doesn't match its definition Bug #840291 {Done: Norbert Preining } [dblatex]

Bug#840189: fixed in texlive-extra 2016.20161103-1

Control: notfixed 840189 texlive-extra/2016.20161103-1 (wrong bug number, see below) Hi Norbert, On 2016-11-03 07:56:07 +, Norbert Preining wrote: > Source: texlive-extra > Source-Version: 2016.20161103-1 > > We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of >