Hi all,
[...]
> I do not find branch 6_0_17 and I do not even think that we need this
> extra branch. I'd recommend to use master and as far as I understood
> Olivier's comment your test should be sufficient.
Sure. Sorry for the branch naming mixup, it was a little late ;)
> I personally also
Hi Sascha,
Thanks a million for patching this issue.
Regards,
Andrew
> On 8 Dec 2016, at 08:11, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Ahh, I've found branch 6_0_17_fix - I can do the merge ...
>
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 09:06:52AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Hi Sascha,
>>
>> On
Ahh, I've found branch 6_0_17_fix - I can do the merge ...
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 09:06:52AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
>
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:04:34AM +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> > to address this problem I have taken a shot at patching Debian’s Artemis to
> > use
Hi Sascha,
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:04:34AM +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> to address this problem I have taken a shot at patching Debian’s Artemis to
> use the new htsjdk API, avoiding SAMFileReader and using the SamReaderFactory
> instead. This fixed the FTBFS for me.
> I tested BAM file
Le jeu. 8 déc. 2016 01:04, Sascha Steinbiss a
écrit :
> Hi Andreas and Andrew,
>
> to address this problem I have taken a shot at patching Debian’s Artemis
> to use the new htsjdk API, avoiding SAMFileReader and using the
> SamReaderFactory instead. This fixed the FTBFS
Hi Andreas and Andrew,
to address this problem I have taken a shot at patching Debian’s Artemis to use
the new htsjdk API, avoiding SAMFileReader and using the SamReaderFactory
instead. This fixed the FTBFS for me.
I tested BAM file reading by opening MAL1.embl.gz from the test/data directory
6 matches
Mail list logo