On Jun 02, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> No system running stable Debian only is supposed to have merged /usr,
Bullshit.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 11:30:24AM +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello Adrian,
Hi Andreas,
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 08:52:12PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > If a member of the release team states that this is acceptable
> > for a stable release, then that's how it is.
>
> If the release
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #863269 {Done: m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri)} [usrmerge] usrmerge is not yet
ready for a stable release
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #863269 to the same values
previously set
> block -1 by 838995 843461 810499 848622
Control: reopen -1
Control: block -1 by 838995 843461 810499 848622 842315
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 06:29:33PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On May 24, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > While merged /usr seems to be the future and will likely be the
> > default in buster, shipping the
Package: usrmerge
Version: 13
Severity: serious
Control: block -1 by 860523 810158 759410 837928
While merged /usr seems to be the future and will likely be the
default in buster, shipping the usrmerge package in stretch
wouldn't bring real benefits to users while creating situations
where the
5 matches
Mail list logo