Bug#866790: postfix rules yield error and fail

2017-07-03 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2017-07-03 08:37:32, intrigeri wrote: > Antoine Beaupré: >> PS: seems to me like a good example why profiles-extra should be >> deployed straight to /etc :p > > One step at a time: I'd rather see AppArmor enabled by default with > a small, robust policy first. And then we can think of extending

Bug#866790: postfix rules yield error and fail

2017-07-03 Thread intrigeri
Antoine Beaupré: > PS: seems to me like a good example why profiles-extra should be > deployed straight to /etc :p One step at a time: I'd rather see AppArmor enabled by default with a small, robust policy first. And then we can think of extending this policy :) Cheers, -- intrigeri

Processed: Re: Bug#866790: postfix rules yield error and fail

2017-07-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 + moreinfo Bug #866790 [apparmor] postfix rules yield error and fail Added tag(s) moreinfo. > tag -1 + unreproducible Bug #866790 [apparmor] postfix rules yield error and fail Added tag(s) unreproducible. -- 866790: http://bugs.debian.org/c

Bug#866790: postfix rules yield error and fail

2017-07-02 Thread intrigeri
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Control: tag -1 + unreproducible Hi, Antoine Beaupre: > ERROR: Include file /etc/apparmor.d/program-chunks/postfix-common not found > ... if apparmor-profiles is installed. > This, obviously, is an error in the postfix* apparmor profiles which > try to include a

Bug#866790: postfix rules yield error and fail

2017-07-01 Thread Antoine Beaupre
Package: apparmor Version: 2.11.0-3 Severity: grave Right now, in debian stretch, any apparmor command will yield: $ sudo aa-disable usr.bin.irssi ERROR: Include file /etc/apparmor.d/program-chunks/postfix-common not found ... if apparmor-profiles is installed. This, obviously, is an error in