On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 12:38:33PM -0400, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
>
> Okay, I've just skipped that one failing test and uploaded the new
> version in order to move things along.
Thanks a lot, Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
على السبت 30 أيلول 2017 21:52، كتب peter green:
> My understanding is that the new version of python 2.7 removed a module
> called "_PyFPE" and that C extensions referencing symbols from this module
> need to be rebuilt. This has been enforced by breaks in the python2.7
> package. Your packag
On 30/09/17 21:43, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
The new upstream version is the solution to this problem, but we've been
going back and forth over issues (fixing one, revealing another) in
updating the package. I'll see if I can do it today, but I don't
understand why this should be blocking python its
على السبت 30 أيلول 2017 16:43، كتب Afif Elghraoui:
> I'll see if I can do it today,
I see Andreas Tille is on top of this. The current issue right now is
this upstream bug we encounter when trying to build the latest upstream
version:
https://github.com/pysam-developers/pysam/issues/542
rega
Hi, Peter,
على السبت 30 أيلول 2017 09:18، كتب peter green:
> Any ETA on fixing this? it is blocking the migration of python2.7 to testing.
>
> I notice that the package tracker claims that there is a new upstream version
> available.
>
The new upstream version is the solution to this problem,
Any ETA on fixing this? it is blocking the migration of python2.7 to testing.
I notice that the package tracker claims that there is a new upstream version
available.
Source: python-pysam
Version: 0.11.2.2+ds-3
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170805 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
7 matches
Mail list logo
