Bug#884476: derivations FTBFS with poppler 0.61.1

Thank you for the reminder. Poppler is always changing, isn't it? NMUs are always okay with me, but I assume that you have better things to do than to NMU an obscure package like my derivations. When I have some time, I will look into the matter. I need to update the package to the upstream

Bug#884476: derivations FTBFS with poppler 0.61.1

Control: tags 884476 upstream On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 18:59:41 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote: > Source: derivations > Version: 0.53.20120414-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: buster sid > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/derivations.html > > ... >

Processed: Re: Bug#884476: derivations FTBFS with poppler 0.61.1

Processing control commands: > tags 884476 upstream Bug #884476 [src:derivations] derivations FTBFS with poppler 0.61.1 Added tag(s) upstream. -- 884476: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884476 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#884476: derivations FTBFS with poppler 0.61.1

Source: derivations Version: 0.53.20120414-2 Severity: serious Tags: buster sid https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/derivations.html ... update_catalog.cc: In function 'int {anonymous}::copy_but(Dict*, Dict*, const set&)': update_catalog.cc:39:33: error: no