Rob Browning <r...@defaultvalue.org> writes: > Please try to migrate soon, and at this point, to guile-3.0 if possible. > Otherwise we might need to consider removing the package from Debian.
As far as I'm concerned, you can feel free to remove geda-gaf from Debian. I'm personally quite happily living on the fork that I've packaged of lepton-eda. Lepton-eda is very actively maintained and improved, and while there's a recent new release of geda-gaf, I'm not likely to spend any more time working on the geda-gaf packaging. > Sometimes it's sufficient to just update the build dependency from say > guile-2.0-dev to guile-3.0-dev and adjust some of the related versions > in configure.ac (or configure.in). This is absolutely not true for geda-gaf, the recent release still demands guile-2.0. If someone actually wants to fix geda-gaf to work with guile-2.2 or later, my suggestion would be to look at how lepton-eda fixed the scheme code in question. Bdale
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
