Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

On 2019-02-12 13:04:57, Petri Hintukainen wrote: > Hello, > > On 2019-02-11 21:28, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Thanks for working on this issue. What's the status of the release? > > Will it be available soon? > > 1.1.0 release has been tagged and should appear in downloads soon. > > I've

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Hello, On 2019-02-11 21:28, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Thanks for working on this issue. What's the status of the release? > Will it be available soon? 1.1.0 release has been tagged and should appear in downloads soon. I've tested a lot of BD-J apps with OpenJDK 11, and it seems to work just

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Hi Petri On 2019-01-22 10:02:40, Petri Hintukainen wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 7:14 AM Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > Looking at the commit history, it seems that there have been some > > changes wrt java > > compatibility, mostly by you. I wonder whether you'd expect libbluray > >

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Hi Adrian, On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:54 PM Adrian Bunk wrote: > Due to popcon (and reverse dependencies) libbluray is a key package > that won't be autoremoved (otherwise it would have been autoremoved > from buster 9 months ago). > That's good to know, thanks for pointing it out. > A

Processed: Re: Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #893227 [src:libbluray] libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 893227: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893227 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #893227 [src:libbluray] libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9 Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 893227: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893227 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Control: severity -1 important On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 7:48 AM Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > OpenJDK 8 will be kept in Buster but it should be used in exceptional > cases (for example the lombok package requires both OpenJDK 8 and 11 to > build). The default Java runtime for Buster is OpenJDK 11 and

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Hi Reinhard, Le 22/01/2019 à 12:14, Reinhard Tartler a écrit : > Can you please give us an update on the roadmap for Java? > What's the status on removing openjdk-8 from buster? OpenJDK 8 will be kept in Buster but it should be used in exceptional cases (for example the lombok package requires

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Hi Petri, The schedule for Debian can be seen at https://wiki.debian.org/DebianBuster: - 2014-11-09: Distribution codename announced - 2017-06-17: Stretch is released,

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Hello, On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 7:14 AM Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Looking at the commit history, it seems that there have been some > changes wrt java > compatibility, mostly by you. I wonder whether you'd expect libbluray > to work with > openjdk-11. If not, is this something on your roadmap, or

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Hi Petri, I'm following up on a question that Sebatian (CC'ed) asked on the mailing list last march [1]. The issue is that Debian intends to drop openjdk-8 in favor of openjdk-11, and we as package maintainers of libbluray are asked to look into this transition. Your response back then was that

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Hi Sebastian, On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:07:38 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Where can I find an official announcement that openjdk-8 will be dropped? The Java Team intends to switch to OpenJDK 11 for Buster (11 is the next Java LTS release). OpenJDK 8 isn't guaranteed to be supported upstream

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

On 2018-04-03 17:50:16, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 02:54:50PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Control: severity -1 important > > Control: tags -1 + upstream > > > > The current version forces the build to use OpenJDK 8. This is currently >

Processed: Re: Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #893227 [src:libbluray] libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9 Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 893227: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893227 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #893227 [src:libbluray] libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9 Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > tags -1 + upstream Bug #893227 [src:libbluray] libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9 Added tag(s) upstream. -- 893227: https://bugs.debi

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Control: severity -1 important Control: tags -1 + upstream The current version forces the build to use OpenJDK 8. This is currently also necessary during runtime. While the build issues can be "fixed" easily, libbluray-bdj requires more work to be compatbile with OpenJDK 9. The changes in JAR

Bug#893227: libbluray FTBFS with openjdk-9

Source: libbluray Version: 1:1.0.2-2 Severity: serious https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/libbluray.html ... compile: [javac] /build/1st/libbluray-1.0.2/src/libbluray/bdj/build.xml:24: warning: 'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to