Bug#902171: libvirt-clients: unsafe blockresize behaviour inconsistent with vol-resize

Control: severity -1 important Hi, thank you for reporting this bug to Debian. I concur with your analysis; in particular, I appreciate that you're taking into account how the behavior of other virsh commands sets users' expectations which are not matched by blockresize. I encourage you to share

Processed: Re: Bug#902171: libvirt-clients: unsafe blockresize behaviour inconsistent with vol-resize

Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #902171 [libvirt-clients] libvirt-clients: unsafe blockresize behaviour inconsistent with vol-resize Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' -- 902171: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=902171 Debian Bug Tracking System C

Bug#902171: libvirt-clients: unsafe blockresize behaviour inconsistent with vol-resize

Package: libvirt-clients Version: 3.0.0-4+deb9u3 Severity: grave Justification: causes serious data loss A user that is familiar with the vol-resize command may inadvertently assume that virsh will protect them against data loss when using blockresize. The 'virsh vol-resize' command (applicab