On 26 June 2018 at 17:11, Niko Tyni wrote:
| On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 08:37:58AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 26 June 2018 at 10:12, Niko Tyni wrote:
|
| > | For the record, the Perl GSL bindings package libmath-gsl-perl (can be
| > | made to) work without the deprecated symbols too.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 08:37:58AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 26 June 2018 at 10:12, Niko Tyni wrote:
> | For the record, the Perl GSL bindings package libmath-gsl-perl (can be
> | made to) work without the deprecated symbols too. It just needs a rebuild,
> | and forcing that rebuild
On 26 June 2018 at 10:12, Niko Tyni wrote:
| On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 06:37:21AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| > I seem to have confused myself. I have new 2.5-2 packages which should carry
| > the deprecated symbols, brought back for our use in the eg the Perl GSL
package.
|
| Thanks!
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 06:37:21AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> I seem to have confused myself. I have new 2.5-2 packages which should carry
> the deprecated symbols, brought back for our use in the eg the Perl GSL
> package.
Thanks! I can confirm that libmath-gsl-perl works fine again
On 25 June 2018 at 06:21, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| I am somewhat as to as to who needs what. I got a few GSL bug reports on
| this and tried to accomodate them, but maybe I reverted the logic in my
| head. Hm.
I seem to have confused myself. I have new 2.5-2 packages which should carry
the
On 25 June 2018 at 13:21, Niko Tyni wrote:
| On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 08:38:00AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| > GSL_CURRENT=24
| > GSL_REVISION=0
| > GSL_AGE=1
|
| > I am stumped. Why does the '24' version not get through?
|
| I think you'd need to reset the age to zero, as
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 08:38:00AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> GSL_CURRENT=24
> GSL_REVISION=0
> GSL_AGE=1
> I am stumped. Why does the '24' version not get through?
I think you'd need to reset the age to zero, as explained in the
configure.ac comments and
On 24 June 2018 at 08:51, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 24 June 2018 at 08:38, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| |
| | But nomatter what I do, I end up with
| |
| | W: libgsl24: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libgsl23
| |
| | ie the library built by upstream is built as libgsl.so.23.1.0 --
On 24 June 2018 at 08:38, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| But nomatter what I do, I end up with
|
| W: libgsl24: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libgsl23
|
| ie the library built by upstream is built as libgsl.so.23.1.0 -- even though
| upstream configure.ac has a long comment header ending
But nomatter what I do, I end up with
W: libgsl24: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libgsl23
ie the library built by upstream is built as libgsl.so.23.1.0 -- even though
upstream configure.ac has a long comment header ending in
dnl gsl-2.5libgsl 24:0:1 libgslcblas 0:0:0
as well
On 24 June 2018 at 15:13, Niko Tyni wrote:
| Package: libgsl23
| Version: 2.5+dfsg-1
| Severity: serious
|
| libgsl23 changed it's ABI without an SONAME bump in 2.5+dfsg-1.
|
| Missing symbols:
|
| % diff -u <(objdump -T libgsl.so.23-buster| cut -c50-) <(objdump -T
libgsl.so.23-sid| cut
Package: libgsl23
Version: 2.5+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
libgsl23 changed it's ABI without an SONAME bump in 2.5+dfsg-1.
Missing symbols:
% diff -u <(objdump -T libgsl.so.23-buster| cut -c50-) <(objdump -T
libgsl.so.23-sid| cut -c50-)|grep ^-
--- /proc/self/fd/132018-06-23
12 matches
Mail list logo
