Control: severity -1 normal
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 07:18:30PM +0100, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> On 27/08/18 17:08, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > How often did you try?
> >
> > I would say the probability to hit is somewhere around 50%:
> >
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #907171 [src:prometheus] prometheus FTBFS:
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
--
907171: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=907171
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On Thu, 2018-08-30 at 13:23 +0100, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> > Unless the tests are run in their own network namespace (which provides
> > some guarantees over what else might be bound to a port, I can't seem
> > to find logs which would confirm or deny if a netns was in use here
> > though)
Ian,
On 30/08/18 09:51, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Does `nc -l -p 9090` repro the test failure perhaps?
yes, of course.
> Unless the tests are run in their own network namespace (which provides
> some guarantees over what else might be bound to a port, I can't seem
> to find logs which would
On Mon, 2018-08-27 at 19:18 +0100, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> On 27/08/18 17:08, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > How often did you try?
> >
> > I would say the probability to hit is somewhere around 50%:
> > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/prometheus.html
>
> I just tried 20 builds,
On 27/08/18 17:08, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> How often did you try?
>
> I would say the probability to hit is somewhere around 50%:
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/prometheus.html
I just tried 20 builds, while using desktop applications that put some
extra strain on tHE CPU,
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 04:57:49PM +0100, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> On 27/08/18 16:51, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> >>> panic: Can't start web handler:listen tcp :9090: bind: address
> already in use
>
> > I am not talking about autopkgtests, I am talking about a FTBFS I was
> > able to reproduce
On 27/08/18 16:51, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>> panic: Can't start web handler:listen tcp :9090: bind: address
already in use
> I am not talking about autopkgtests, I am talking about a FTBFS I was
> able to reproduce locally.
>
> But retrying a few more times, this might actually be a flaky test?
I
Santiago,
On 27/08/18 16:00, Santiago Vila wrote:
>> This is a known problem when running the autopkgtests, becasue the
>> installed package starts the daemon and then the tests fail when trying
>> to use the same port; but this is not a FTBFS: the build daemons do not
>> fail to build from
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 03:27:07PM +0100, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> Adrian,
Hi Martín,
> On 24/08/18 13:47, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/prometheus.html
> >
> > ...
> > panic: Can't start web handler:listen tcp :9090: bind: address
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> Adrian,
>
> On 24/08/18 13:47, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/prometheus.html
> >
> > ...
> > panic: Can't start web handler:listen tcp :9090: bind: address already in
> > use
>
> This
Adrian,
On 24/08/18 13:47, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/prometheus.html
>
> ...
> panic: Can't start web handler:listen tcp :9090: bind: address already in use
This is a known problem when running the autopkgtests, becasue the
Source: prometheus
Version: 2.3.2+ds-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/prometheus.html
...
panic: Can't start web handler:listen tcp :9090: bind: address already in use
goroutine 229 [running]:
13 matches
Mail list logo
