On 2018-10-24 13:43:34, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> Control: fixed 907835 4.11.1~pre.20180911.5acdd26fdc+dfsg-5
>
> On 9/26/18 4:22 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> Antoine Beaupré writes ("Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#907835: newer version in
>> stable"):
>>>
Antoine Beaupré writes ("Re: [Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#907835: newer version in
stable"):
> It's been two weeks and stable still has a newer version than unstable,
> which suffers from four security issues fixed in stable.
>
> I understand you might have other
On 2018-09-05 12:36:54, Ian Jackson wrote:
> The 4.8-based security updates have not been going to sid/buster for
> rather obscure reasons. We have packages for 4.11 in preparation, so
> hopefully this will become irrelevant soon.
It's been two weeks and stable still has a newer version than
On 2018-09-05 12:36:54, Ian Jackson wrote:
[...]
> I agree that this is an RC bug. Fixing it by removing the packages
> from buster wouldn't help, though.
Agreed. Removal is obviously an unwanted side-effect... :)
[...]
> The 4.8-based security updates have not been going to sid/buster for
>
Antoine Beaupre writes ("[Pkg-xen-devel] Bug#907835: newer version in stable"):
> Source: xen
> Version: 4.8.3+xsa267+shim4.10.1+xsa267-1+deb9u9
> Severity: serious
>
> The version of the Xen packages in unstable and buster is lower than
> the one in Debian stretch.
Source: xen
Version: 4.8.3+xsa267+shim4.10.1+xsa267-1+deb9u9
Severity: serious
The version of the Xen packages in unstable and buster is lower than
the one in Debian stretch. That seems highly irregular and will
obviously break upgrades to buster.
The reason this is marked as "serious" is
6 matches
Mail list logo
