Hi Chris,
* Chris Lamb [2018-09-30 20:27]:
Great stuff; thanks! The only thing I would add would be something that
explicitly addresses the the "freeware" term - it is a bit of a
"trigger word" for people looking for DFSG violations.
Now I get why you where asking for this, thanks for the
Hi Jochen,
> I added comments here:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/python-pcl/commit/bff3480ce174fe28192abe3e256a195081a2013d
>
> Also, I added a comment to the PCL copyright:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/pcl/commit/df7d3a72113e1b55f2820ae4b5d8773572df43f5
Great
Hi Chris,
thanks again to bringing this to my attention.
* Chris Lamb [2018-09-28 16:56]:
However, as a concrete suggestion I would add "Comment" section to your
debian/copyright and almost-literally copy your (own) words, ie.:
I added comments here:
Jochen,
> Do you have a proposal how to better document this?
Not entirely sure what you mean by "better" as you currently do not
document this at all (unless I am missing something).
However, as a concrete suggestion I would add "Comment" section to your
debian/copyright and almost-literally
Hi Chris,
* Chris Lamb [2018-09-28 10:07]:
I just ACCEPTed python-pcl from NEW but noticed it was missing
attribution or similar in debian/copyright for at least some files
listed as "freeware" (!= is this even DFSG-free software?).
I guess you are talking about this line:
Source: python-pcl
Version: 0.3.0~rc1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justication: Policy 12.5
X-Debbugs-CC: Jochen Sprickerhof ,
ftpmas...@debian.org
Hi,
I just ACCEPTed python-pcl from NEW but noticed it was missing
attribution or similar in debian/copyright for at least some files
listed as
6 matches
Mail list logo
