Bug#912549: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

2019-03-14 Thread Matthias Klose
On 14.03.19 23:03, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > > On 13/03/2019 17:47, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> please look at the new upstream 1.7.2 and 1.8 releases. > > I got a quick look at these new versions released this week, IcedTea Web > 1.7.2 is rather close to the version in unstable since October

Bug#912549: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

2019-03-14 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
On 13/03/2019 17:47, Matthias Klose wrote: > please look at the new upstream 1.7.2 and 1.8 releases. I got a quick look at these new versions released this week, IcedTea Web 1.7.2 is rather close to the version in unstable since October and has a few extra Java 9+ fixes, it's probably worth

Bug#912549: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

2019-03-14 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:25:06PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > On 13/03/2019 21:30, Markus Koschany wrote: > > >> please look at the new upstream 1.7.2 and 1.8 releases. May be that's sensible for Buster+1 > > In https://bugs.debian.org/855686 Emmanuel wrote that icedtea-web will > > be

Bug#912549: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

2019-03-13 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
On 13/03/2019 21:30, Markus Koschany wrote: Michael Crusoe has suggested a workaround[1]. What do you think about this? >>> >>> In case there is no answer to this question I assume it is OK to >>> upload the workaround. Hope you agree with this. >> >> please look at the new upstream

Bug#912549: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

2019-03-13 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 13.03.19 um 17:47 schrieb Matthias Klose: > On 13.03.19 10:54, Andreas Tille wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:41:22AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: >>> Michael Crusoe has suggested a workaround[1]. What do you think about >>> this? >> >> In case there is no answer to this question I assume

Bug#912549: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

2019-03-13 Thread Matthias Klose
On 13.03.19 10:54, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:41:22AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: >> Michael Crusoe has suggested a workaround[1]. What do you think about >> this? > > In case there is no answer to this question I assume it is OK to > upload the workaround. Hope you agree

Bug#912549: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

2019-03-13 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:41:22AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Michael Crusoe has suggested a workaround[1]. What do you think about > this? In case there is no answer to this question I assume it is OK to upload the workaround. Hope you agree with this. Kind regards Andreas. >

Bug#912549: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

2019-03-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, Michael Crusoe has suggested a workaround[1]. What do you think about this? Kind regards, Andreas. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=912549#10 -- http://fam-tille.de

Bug#912549: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

2019-03-05 Thread Michael Crusoe
Dear maintainers, I have a fix for this bug (by copying in the relevant files from OpenJDK 9) at https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/icedtea-web/merge_requests/5 It is a hack, but from my testing it works. I hope this is helpful; I would like to see this package stay in Debian Buster. Cheers,

Bug#912549: icedtea-web FTBFS with OpenJDK 11

2018-11-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: icedtea-web Version: 1.7.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/icedtea-web.html ... hecking for distribution package version... 1.7.1 checking what version string to use... 1.7.1 (1.7.1) checking whether to build the browser